{"paper":{"title":"Galileons in the Sky","arxiv_id":"1204.5492","primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","submitted_at":"2012-04-24T20:29:35+00:00","version_compiled":"v2"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13-20260917 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v2","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":0.57,"id":"s0","own":false,"role":"contribution","text":"We review the different frameworks in which Galileon scalar fields have been seen to emerge such an in DGP, New Massive Gravity and Ghost-free massive Gravity and emphasize their relation with the Lovelock invariant in braneworld models.","hedge":{"p":0.95,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.17,"main_claim_p":0.1,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.1,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.43,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.57,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":0.78,"id":"s1","own":false,"role":"background","text":"The existence of a non-renormalization theorem for Galileon scalar fields makes them especially attractive candidates for inflation as well as for late-time acceleration.","hedge":{"p":0.94,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.08,"main_claim_p":0.2,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.12,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.01,"background":0.78,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.01,"interpretation":0.2}},{"i":2,"p":0.97,"id":"s2","own":false,"role":"contribution","text":"In particular we review the self-accelerating and degravitating branches of solutions present in Galileon models when arising from Massive Gravity and discuss their phenomenology.","hedge":{"p":0.91,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.28,"main_claim_p":0.14,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.05,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.01,"result":0.0,"background":0.02,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.97,"interpretation":0.0}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":0.89,"text":"The existence of a non-renormalization theorem for Galileon scalar fields makes them especially attractive candidates for inflation as well as for late-time acceleration.","location":"abstract s1","hedge_strength":{"p":0.94,"label":"asserted"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"OpenRouter","model":"classifier-1.13","endpoint":"https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":2994,"cost_usd_reported":0.000126},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13-20260917","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.02,"states_limitation":0.06,"human_participants":0.01,"controlled_comparison":0.02,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.03,"compares_with_prior_results":0.22,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.01},"evidential_basis":{"p":0.98,"value":"literature","probabilities":{"argument":0.02,"literature":0.98,"proof_or_derivation":0.0,"analysis_of_existing_data":0.0,"observation_or_experiment":0.0,"simulation_or_computation":0.0}},"contribution_type":{"p":1.0,"value":"review","probabilities":{"review":1.0,"method_or_tool":0.0,"empirical_study":0.0,"simulation_study":0.0,"theoretical_result":0.0,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.0}},"contribution_statement":{"p":0.57,"text":"In particular we review the self-accelerating and degravitating branches of solutions present in Galileon models when arising from Massive Gravity and discuss their phenomenology.","location":"abstract s2"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v2"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":3,"sentences_in_abstract":3},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448}}