{"paper":{"title":"R-parity violating supersymmetric contributions to the P, CP-odd electron-nucleon interaction at the one-loop level","arxiv_id":"1204.6466","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2012-04-29T09:56:03+00:00","version_compiled":"v2"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13-20260917 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v2","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":0.99,"id":"s0","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"The contribution of the R-parity violating minimal supersymmetric Standard model (RPVMSSM) at the one-loop level to the 199Hg atomic electric dipole moment (EDM) through P, CP-odd electron-nucleon (e-N) interaction is calculated.","hedge":{"p":0.99,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.94,"main_claim_p":0.11,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.26,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.01,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.99,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":0.84,"id":"s1","own":true,"role":"result","text":"We show that the current experimental data of the 199Hg EDM give tighter constraints on some of the imaginary parts of R-parity violating (RPV) coupling than those currently known.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.88,"main_claim_p":0.66,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.79,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.84,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.16}},{"i":2,"p":0.82,"id":"s2","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"We add also the analysis of the P, CP-odd 4-quark interaction generated by R-parity violating interactions at the one-loop level, and discuss the possibility to constrain them in future experiments.","hedge":{"p":0.77,"label":"hedged_possibility"},"own_p":0.91,"main_claim_p":0.1,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.05,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.18,"contribution":0.82,"interpretation":0.0}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":1.0,"text":"We show that the current experimental data of the 199Hg EDM give tighter constraints on some of the imaginary parts of R-parity violating (RPV) coupling than those currently known.","location":"abstract s1","hedge_strength":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"OpenRouter","model":"classifier-1.13","endpoint":"https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":3107,"cost_usd_reported":0.00013},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13-20260917","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.04,"states_limitation":0.12,"human_participants":0.01,"controlled_comparison":0.04,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.19,"compares_with_prior_results":0.71,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.02},"evidential_basis":{"p":0.61,"value":"simulation or computation","probabilities":{"argument":0.0,"literature":0.0,"proof_or_derivation":0.19,"analysis_of_existing_data":0.2,"observation_or_experiment":0.0,"simulation_or_computation":0.61}},"contribution_type":{"p":1.0,"value":"theoretical result","probabilities":{"review":0.0,"method_or_tool":0.0,"empirical_study":0.0,"simulation_study":0.0,"theoretical_result":1.0,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.0}},"contribution_statement":{"p":0.6,"text":"The contribution of the R-parity violating minimal supersymmetric Standard model (RPVMSSM) at the one-loop level to the 199Hg atomic electric dipole moment (EDM) through P, CP-odd electron-nucleon (e-N) interaction is calculated.","location":"abstract s0"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v2"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":3,"sentences_in_abstract":3},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448}}