{"paper":{"title":"A Collective Breaking of R-Parity","arxiv_id":"1207.5787","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2012-07-24T19:59:19+00:00","version_compiled":"v1"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13-20260917 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v1","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":1.0,"id":"s0","own":false,"role":"background","text":"Supersymmetric theories with an R-parity generally yield a striking missing energy signature, with cascade decays concluding in a neutralino that escapes the detector.","hedge":{"p":0.98,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.04,"main_claim_p":0.03,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.05,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":1.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":1.0,"id":"s1","own":false,"role":"background","text":"In theories where R-parity is broken the missing energy is replaced with additional jets or leptons, often making traditional search strategies ineffective.","hedge":{"p":0.94,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.05,"main_claim_p":0.04,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.16,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":1.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":2,"p":0.97,"id":"s2","own":false,"role":"background","text":"Such R-parity violation is very constrained, however, by resulting B and L violating signals, requiring couplings so small that LSPs will decay outside the detector in all but a few scenarios.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.06,"main_claim_p":0.04,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.52,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.02,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.97,"limitation":0.01,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":3,"p":0.9,"id":"s3","own":false,"role":"background","text":"In theories with additional matter fields, R-parity can be broken collectively, such that R-parity is not broken by any single coupling, but only by an ensemble of couplings.","hedge":{"p":0.63,"label":"hedged_possibility"},"own_p":0.07,"main_claim_p":0.09,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.07,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.01,"method":0.02,"result":0.0,"background":0.9,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.07,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":4,"p":0.43,"id":"s4","own":false,"role":"result","text":"Cascade decays can proceed normally, with each step only sensitive to one or two couplings at a time, but B and L violation requires the full set, yielding a highly suppressed constraint. s-channel production of new scalar states, typically small for standard RPV, can be large when RPV is broken collectively.","hedge":{"p":0.95,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.29,"main_claim_p":0.38,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.81,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.02,"result":0.43,"background":0.27,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.09,"interpretation":0.19}},{"i":5,"p":0.36,"id":"s5","own":false,"role":"result","text":"While missing energy is absent, making these models difficult to discover by traditional SUSY searches, they produce complicated many object resonances (MORes), with many different possible numbers of jets and leptons.","hedge":{"p":0.98,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.22,"main_claim_p":0.14,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.21,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.01,"method":0.0,"result":0.36,"background":0.34,"limitation":0.03,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.04,"interpretation":0.22}},{"i":6,"p":1.0,"id":"s6","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"We outline a simple model and discuss its discoverability at the LHC.","hedge":{"p":0.57,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.89,"main_claim_p":0.1,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.04,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":1.0,"interpretation":0.0}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":0.55,"text":"Cascade decays can proceed normally, with each step only sensitive to one or two couplings at a time, but B and L violation requires the full set, yielding a highly suppressed constraint. s-channel production of new scalar states, typically small for standard RPV, can be large when RPV is broken collectively.","location":"abstract s4","hedge_strength":{"p":0.95,"label":"asserted"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"OpenRouter","model":"classifier-1.13","endpoint":"https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":5730,"cost_usd_reported":0.000241},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13-20260917","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.04,"states_limitation":0.43,"human_participants":0.01,"controlled_comparison":0.08,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.05,"compares_with_prior_results":0.58,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.02},"evidential_basis":{"p":0.97,"value":"argument","probabilities":{"argument":0.97,"literature":0.0,"proof_or_derivation":0.02,"analysis_of_existing_data":0.0,"observation_or_experiment":0.0,"simulation_or_computation":0.01}},"contribution_type":{"p":0.99,"value":"theoretical result","probabilities":{"review":0.0,"method_or_tool":0.01,"empirical_study":0.0,"simulation_study":0.0,"theoretical_result":0.99,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.0}},"contribution_statement":{"p":0.99,"text":"We outline a simple model and discuss its discoverability at the LHC.","location":"abstract s6"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v1"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":7,"sentences_in_abstract":7},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448}}