{"paper":{"title":"Bright broad-band afterglows of gravitational wave bursts from mergers of binary neutron stars","arxiv_id":"1301.0439","primary_cat":"astro-ph.HE","submitted_at":"2013-01-03T12:38:14+00:00","version_compiled":"v2"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13-20260917 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v2","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":0.87,"id":"s0","own":false,"role":"background","text":"If double neutron star mergers leave behind a massive magnetar rather than a black hole, a bright early afterglow can follow the gravitational wave burst (GWB) even if there is no short gamma-ray burst (SGRB) - GWB association or there is an association but the SGRB does not beam towards earth.","hedge":{"p":0.96,"label":"hedged_possibility"},"own_p":0.09,"main_claim_p":0.17,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.07,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.03,"method":0.0,"result":0.05,"background":0.87,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.04,"interpretation":0.01}},{"i":1,"p":0.96,"id":"s1","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"Besides directly dissipating the proto-magnetar wind as suggested by Zhang, we here suggest that the magnetar wind could push the ejecta launched during the merger process, and under certain conditions, would reach a relativistic speed.","hedge":{"p":0.96,"label":"hedged_possibility"},"own_p":0.54,"main_claim_p":0.07,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.09,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.04,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.96,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":2,"p":0.39,"id":"s2","own":false,"role":"result","text":"Such a magnetar-powered ejecta, when interacting with the ambient medium, would develop a bright broad-band afterglow due to synchrotron radiation.","hedge":{"p":0.53,"label":"hedged_possibility"},"own_p":0.2,"main_claim_p":0.15,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.04,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.05,"result":0.39,"background":0.1,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.33,"interpretation":0.13}},{"i":3,"p":0.95,"id":"s3","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"We study this physical scenario in detail, and present the predicted X-ray, optical and radio light curves for a range of magnetar and ejecta parameters.","hedge":{"p":0.9,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.94,"main_claim_p":0.06,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.05,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.05,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.95,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":4,"p":1.0,"id":"s4","own":true,"role":"result","text":"We show that the X-ray and optical lightcurves usually peak around the magnetar spindown time scale (10^3-10^5s), reaching brightness readily detectable by wide-field X-ray and optical telescopes, and remain detectable for an extended period.","hedge":{"p":0.98,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.92,"main_claim_p":0.24,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.97,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":1.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":5,"p":1.0,"id":"s5","own":true,"role":"result","text":"The radio afterglow peaks later, but is much brighter than the case without a magnetar energy injection.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.87,"main_claim_p":0.11,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.95,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":1.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":6,"p":0.97,"id":"s6","own":false,"role":"interpretation","text":"Therefore, such bright broad-band afterglows, if detected and combined with GWBs in the future, would be a probe of massive millisecond magnetars and stiff equation-of-state for nuclear matter.","hedge":{"p":0.86,"label":"hedged_possibility"},"own_p":0.24,"main_claim_p":0.82,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.05,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.03,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.97}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":0.93,"text":"Therefore, such bright broad-band afterglows, if detected and combined with GWBs in the future, would be a probe of massive millisecond magnetars and stiff equation-of-state for nuclear matter.","location":"abstract s6","hedge_strength":{"p":0.86,"label":"hedged possibility"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"OpenRouter","model":"classifier-1.13","endpoint":"https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":5898,"cost_usd_reported":0.000248},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13-20260917","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.04,"states_limitation":0.23,"human_participants":0.01,"controlled_comparison":0.64,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.83,"compares_with_prior_results":0.72,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.02},"evidential_basis":{"p":0.84,"value":"simulation or computation","probabilities":{"argument":0.08,"literature":0.0,"proof_or_derivation":0.08,"analysis_of_existing_data":0.0,"observation_or_experiment":0.0,"simulation_or_computation":0.84}},"contribution_type":{"p":0.84,"value":"theoretical result","probabilities":{"review":0.0,"method_or_tool":0.0,"empirical_study":0.0,"simulation_study":0.16,"theoretical_result":0.84,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.0}},"contribution_statement":{"p":0.76,"text":"Besides directly dissipating the proto-magnetar wind as suggested by Zhang, we here suggest that the magnetar wind could push the ejecta launched during the merger process, and under certain conditions, would reach a relativistic speed.","location":"abstract s1"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v2"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":7,"sentences_in_abstract":7},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448}}