{"paper":{"title":"Type IIP supernova 2008in: the explosion of a normal red supergiant","arxiv_id":"1306.5122","primary_cat":"astro-ph.SR","submitted_at":"2013-06-21T13:09:02+00:00","version_compiled":"v1"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13-20260917 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v1","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":1.0,"id":"s0","own":false,"role":"background","text":"The explosion energy and the ejecta mass of a type IIP supernova make up the basis for the theory of explosion mechanism.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.05,"main_claim_p":0.04,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.04,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":1.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":0.66,"id":"s1","own":false,"role":"gap","text":"So far, these parameters have only been determined for seven events.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.05,"main_claim_p":0.02,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.98,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.66,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.34,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":2,"p":0.84,"id":"s2","own":false,"role":"contribution","text":"Type IIP supernova 2008in is another well-observed event for which a detailed hydrodynamic modeling can be used to derive the supernova parameters.","hedge":{"p":0.88,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.28,"main_claim_p":0.05,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.08,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.01,"method":0.01,"result":0.0,"background":0.14,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.84,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":3,"p":0.99,"id":"s3","own":true,"role":"method","text":"Hydrodynamic modeling was employed to describe the bolometric light curve and the expansion velocities at the photosphere level.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.87,"main_claim_p":0.03,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.03,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.99,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.01,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":4,"p":1.0,"id":"s4","own":true,"role":"method","text":"A time-dependent model for hydrogen ionization and excitation was applied to model the Halpha and Hbeta line profiles.","hedge":{"p":0.99,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.86,"main_claim_p":0.02,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.05,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":1.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":5,"p":1.0,"id":"s5","own":true,"role":"result","text":"We found an ejecta mass of 13.6 Msun, an explosion energy of 5.05x10^50 erg, a presupernova radius of 570 Rsun, and a radioactive Ni-56 mass of 0.015 Msun.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.97,"main_claim_p":0.53,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.99,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":1.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":6,"p":1.0,"id":"s6","own":true,"role":"result","text":"The estimated progenitor mass is 15.5 Msun.","hedge":{"p":0.95,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.83,"main_claim_p":0.12,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.98,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":1.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":7,"p":0.88,"id":"s7","own":true,"role":"limitation","text":"We uncovered a problem of the Halpha and Hbeta description at the early phase, which cannot be resolved within a spherically symmetric model.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.93,"main_claim_p":0.06,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.05,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.12,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.88,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":8,"p":0.72,"id":"s8","own":true,"role":"result","text":"The presupernova of SN 2008in was a normal red supergiant with the minimum mass of the progenitor among eight type IIP supernovae explored by means of the hydrodynamic modeling.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.83,"main_claim_p":0.55,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.98,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.72,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.28}},{"i":9,"p":0.55,"id":"s9","own":false,"role":"interpretation","text":"The problem of the absence of type IIP supernovae with the progenitor masses <15 Msun in this sample remains open.","hedge":{"p":0.92,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.47,"main_claim_p":0.13,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.97,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.14,"method":0.0,"result":0.05,"background":0.01,"limitation":0.18,"future_work":0.06,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.55}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":0.94,"text":"The presupernova of SN 2008in was a normal red supergiant with the minimum mass of the progenitor among eight type IIP supernovae explored by means of the hydrodynamic modeling.","location":"abstract s8","hedge_strength":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"OpenRouter","model":"classifier-1.13","endpoint":"https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":7637,"cost_usd_reported":0.000321},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13-20260917","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.04,"states_limitation":0.96,"human_participants":0.01,"controlled_comparison":0.07,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.99,"compares_with_prior_results":0.89,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.02},"evidential_basis":{"p":0.63,"value":"simulation or computation","probabilities":{"argument":0.0,"literature":0.0,"proof_or_derivation":0.0,"analysis_of_existing_data":0.33,"observation_or_experiment":0.04,"simulation_or_computation":0.63}},"contribution_type":{"p":0.57,"value":"empirical study","probabilities":{"review":0.0,"method_or_tool":0.0,"empirical_study":0.57,"simulation_study":0.43,"theoretical_result":0.0,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.0}},"contribution_statement":{"p":0.76,"text":"We found an ejecta mass of 13.6 Msun, an explosion energy of 5.05x10^50 erg, a presupernova radius of 570 Rsun, and a radioactive Ni-56 mass of 0.015 Msun.","location":"abstract s5"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v1"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":10,"sentences_in_abstract":10},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448}}