{"paper":{"title":"Cosmological Parameter Estimation with Large Scale Structure Observations","arxiv_id":"1308.6186","primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","submitted_at":"2013-08-28T15:30:55+00:00","version_compiled":"v3"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13-20260917 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v3","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":0.58,"id":"s0","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"We estimate the sensitivity of future galaxy surveys to cosmological parameters, using the redshift dependent angular power spectra of galaxy number counts, $C_\\ell(z_1,z_2)$, calculated with all relativistic corrections at first order in perturbation theory.","hedge":{"p":0.97,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.94,"main_claim_p":0.07,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.12,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.42,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.58,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":0.51,"id":"s1","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"We pay special attention to the redshift dependence of the non-linearity scale and present Fisher matrix forecasts for Euclid-like and DES-like galaxy surveys.","hedge":{"p":0.76,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.93,"main_claim_p":0.06,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.06,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.49,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.51,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":2,"p":0.5,"id":"s2","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"We compare the standard $P(k)$ analysis with the new $C_\\ell(z_1,z_2)$ method.","hedge":{"p":0.58,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.84,"main_claim_p":0.05,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.41,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.49,"result":0.01,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.5,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":3,"p":1.0,"id":"s3","own":true,"role":"result","text":"We show that for surveys with photometric redshifts the new analysis performs significantly better than the $P(k)$ analysis.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.93,"main_claim_p":0.63,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.9,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":1.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":4,"p":0.57,"id":"s4","own":true,"role":"limitation","text":"For spectroscopic redshifts, however, the large number of redshift bins which would be needed to fully profit from the redshift information, is severely limited by shot noise.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.8,"main_claim_p":0.1,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.31,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.42,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.57,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.01}},{"i":5,"p":0.97,"id":"s5","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"We also identify surveys which can measure the lensing contribution and we study the monopole, $C_0(z_1,z_2)$.","hedge":{"p":0.99,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.93,"main_claim_p":0.05,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.06,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.03,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.97,"interpretation":0.0}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":1.0,"text":"We show that for surveys with photometric redshifts the new analysis performs significantly better than the $P(k)$ analysis.","location":"abstract s3","hedge_strength":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"OpenRouter","model":"classifier-1.13","endpoint":"https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":5004,"cost_usd_reported":0.00021},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13-20260917","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.04,"states_limitation":0.93,"human_participants":0.01,"controlled_comparison":0.79,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.09,"compares_with_prior_results":0.97,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.02},"evidential_basis":{"p":0.95,"value":"simulation or computation","probabilities":{"argument":0.0,"literature":0.0,"proof_or_derivation":0.05,"analysis_of_existing_data":0.0,"observation_or_experiment":0.0,"simulation_or_computation":0.95}},"contribution_type":{"p":0.79,"value":"method or tool","probabilities":{"review":0.0,"method_or_tool":0.79,"empirical_study":0.0,"simulation_study":0.07,"theoretical_result":0.14,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.0}},"contribution_statement":{"p":0.87,"text":"We estimate the sensitivity of future galaxy surveys to cosmological parameters, using the redshift dependent angular power spectra of galaxy number counts, $C_\\ell(z_1,z_2)$, calculated with all relativistic corrections at first order in perturbation theory.","location":"abstract s0"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v3"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":6,"sentences_in_abstract":6},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448,"review_comments_judged":{"judged_by":["gpt-5.6-luna","grok-4.7"],"judged_against":"Pith's own text copy of each paper: text extracted from the PDF, the first 90,000 characters","measured_on":"2026-10-04","accurate":113,"decided":149,"sampled_reviews":200,"split_by_lane":false,"by_lane":"https://pith.science/accuracy#by-lane"}}}