{"paper":{"title":"Monojet versus rest of the world I: t-channel Models","arxiv_id":"1402.2285","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2014-02-10T21:00:21+00:00","version_compiled":"v1"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13-20260917 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v1","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":1.0,"id":"s0","own":false,"role":"background","text":"Monojet searches using Effective Field Theory (EFT) operators are usually interpreted as a robust and model independent constraint on direct detection (DD) scattering cross-sections.","hedge":{"p":0.96,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.05,"main_claim_p":0.04,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.07,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":1.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":0.97,"id":"s1","own":false,"role":"background","text":"At the same time, a mediator particle must be present to produce the dark matter (DM) at the LHC.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.05,"main_claim_p":0.02,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.04,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.02,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.97,"limitation":0.01,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":2,"p":0.99,"id":"s2","own":false,"role":"background","text":"This mediator particle may be produced on shell, so that direct searches for the mediating particle can constrain the effective operator being applied to monojet constraints.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"hedged_possibility"},"own_p":0.06,"main_claim_p":0.04,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.03,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.01,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.99,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":3,"p":0.89,"id":"s3","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"In this first paper, we do a case study on t-channel models in monojet searches, where the (Standard Model singlet) DM is pair produced via a t-channel mediating particle, whose supersymmetric analogue is the squark.","hedge":{"p":0.95,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.57,"main_claim_p":0.05,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.05,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.1,"result":0.0,"background":0.01,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.89,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":4,"p":0.9,"id":"s4","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"We compare monojet constraints to direct constraints on single or pair production of the mediator from multi-jets plus missing energy searches and we identify the regions where the latter dominate over the former.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.93,"main_claim_p":0.16,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.49,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.04,"result":0.06,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.9,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":5,"p":0.52,"id":"s5","own":false,"role":"result","text":"We show that computing bounds using supersymmetric simplified models and in the narrow width approximation, as done in previous work in the literature, misses important quantitative effects.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.41,"main_claim_p":0.17,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.14,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.41,"method":0.0,"result":0.52,"background":0.01,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.06,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":6,"p":0.66,"id":"s6","own":true,"role":"result","text":"We perform a full event simulation and statistical analysis, and we compute the effects of both on- and off-shell production of the mediating particle, showing that for both the monojet and multi-jets plus missing energy searches, previously derived bounds provided more conservative bounds than what can be extracted by including all relevant processes in the simulation.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.96,"main_claim_p":0.34,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.84,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.14,"result":0.66,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.19,"interpretation":0.01}},{"i":7,"p":0.99,"id":"s7","own":true,"role":"result","text":"Monojets and searches for supersymmetry (SUSY) provide comparable bounds on a wide range of the parameter space, with SUSY searches usually providing stronger bounds, except in the regions where the DM particle and the mediator are very mass degenerate.","hedge":{"p":0.99,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.85,"main_claim_p":0.4,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.96,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.99,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.01}},{"i":8,"p":0.86,"id":"s8","own":true,"role":"result","text":"The EFT approximation rarely is able to reproduce the actual limits.","hedge":{"p":0.96,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.7,"main_claim_p":0.32,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.1,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.86,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.14}},{"i":9,"p":1.0,"id":"s9","own":false,"role":"future_work","text":"In a second paper to follow, we consider the case of s-channel mediators.","hedge":{"p":0.78,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.18,"main_claim_p":0.02,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.05,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":1.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":0.52,"text":"The EFT approximation rarely is able to reproduce the actual limits.","location":"abstract s8","hedge_strength":{"p":0.96,"label":"asserted"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"OpenRouter","model":"classifier-1.13","endpoint":"https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":7722,"cost_usd_reported":0.000324},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13-20260917","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.2,"states_limitation":0.42,"human_participants":0.01,"controlled_comparison":0.27,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.11,"compares_with_prior_results":0.97,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.02},"evidential_basis":{"p":1.0,"value":"simulation or computation","probabilities":{"argument":0.0,"literature":0.0,"proof_or_derivation":0.0,"analysis_of_existing_data":0.0,"observation_or_experiment":0.0,"simulation_or_computation":1.0}},"contribution_type":{"p":1.0,"value":"simulation study","probabilities":{"review":0.0,"method_or_tool":0.0,"empirical_study":0.0,"simulation_study":1.0,"theoretical_result":0.0,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.0}},"contribution_statement":{"p":0.97,"text":"We perform a full event simulation and statistical analysis, and we compute the effects of both on- and off-shell production of the mediating particle, showing that for both the monojet and multi-jets plus missing energy searches, previously derived bounds provided more conservative bounds than what can be extracted by including all relevant processes in the simulation.","location":"abstract s6"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v1"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":10,"sentences_in_abstract":10},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448,"review_comments_judged":{"judged_by":["gpt-5.6-luna","grok-4.7"],"judged_against":"Pith's own text copy of each paper: text extracted from the PDF, the first 90,000 characters","measured_on":"2026-10-04","accurate":113,"decided":149,"sampled_reviews":200,"split_by_lane":false,"by_lane":"https://pith.science/accuracy#by-lane"}}}