{"paper":{"title":"Conflicting Symmetries in Topologically Ordered Surface States of Three-dimensional Bosonic Symmetry Protected Topological Phases","arxiv_id":"1403.2018","primary_cat":"cond-mat.str-el","submitted_at":"2014-03-09T00:20:11+00:00","version_compiled":"v2"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13-20260917 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v2","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":0.87,"id":"s0","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"We study the Z2 topologically ordered surface state of three-dimensional bosonic SPT phases with the discrete symmetries G1 x G2.","hedge":{"p":0.83,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.8,"main_claim_p":0.03,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.24,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.13,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.87,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":0.99,"id":"s1","own":false,"role":"background","text":"It has been argued that the topologically ordered surface state cannot be realized on a purely two-dimensional lattice model.","hedge":{"p":0.78,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.03,"main_claim_p":0.06,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.12,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.01,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.99,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":2,"p":0.95,"id":"s2","own":true,"role":"result","text":"We carefully examine the statement and show that the surface state should break G2 if the symmetry G1 is gauged.","hedge":{"p":0.99,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.91,"main_claim_p":0.64,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.07,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.95,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.05,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":3,"p":0.94,"id":"s3","own":true,"role":"interpretation","text":"This manifests the conflict of the symmetry G1 and G2 on the surface of the three-dimensional SPT phase.","hedge":{"p":0.99,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.59,"main_claim_p":0.29,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.05,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.06,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.94}},{"i":4,"p":0.99,"id":"s4","own":false,"role":"interpretation","text":"Given that there is no such phenomena in the purely two-dimensional model, it signals that the symmetries are encoded anomalously on the surface of the three-dimensional SPT phases and that the surface state can never be realized on the purely two-dimensional models.","hedge":{"p":0.85,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.49,"main_claim_p":0.77,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.22,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.01,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.99}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":0.97,"text":"Given that there is no such phenomena in the purely two-dimensional model, it signals that the symmetries are encoded anomalously on the surface of the three-dimensional SPT phases and that the surface state can never be realized on the purely two-dimensional models.","location":"abstract s4","hedge_strength":{"p":0.85,"label":"asserted"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"OpenRouter","model":"classifier-1.13","endpoint":"https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":4285,"cost_usd_reported":0.00018},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13-20260917","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.04,"states_limitation":0.29,"human_participants":0.01,"controlled_comparison":0.13,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.03,"compares_with_prior_results":0.71,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.01},"evidential_basis":{"p":0.83,"value":"argument","probabilities":{"argument":0.83,"literature":0.0,"proof_or_derivation":0.17,"analysis_of_existing_data":0.0,"observation_or_experiment":0.0,"simulation_or_computation":0.0}},"contribution_type":{"p":0.97,"value":"theoretical result","probabilities":{"review":0.0,"method_or_tool":0.0,"empirical_study":0.0,"simulation_study":0.0,"theoretical_result":0.97,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.03}},"contribution_statement":{"p":1.0,"text":"We carefully examine the statement and show that the surface state should break G2 if the symmetry G1 is gauged.","location":"abstract s2"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v2"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":5,"sentences_in_abstract":5},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448}}