{"paper":{"title":"Probing wrong-sign Yukawa couplings at the LHC and a future linear collider","arxiv_id":"1403.4736","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2014-03-19T08:51:51+00:00","version_compiled":"v4"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13-20260917 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v4","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":0.73,"id":"s0","own":false,"role":"contribution","text":"We consider the two-Higgs-doublet model as a framework in which to evaluate the viability of scenarios in which the sign of the coupling of the observed Higgs boson to down-type fermions (in particular, $b$-quark pairs) is opposite to that of the Standard Model (SM), while at the same time all other tree-level couplings are close to the SM values.","hedge":{"p":0.38,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.46,"main_claim_p":0.06,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.5,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.12,"result":0.0,"background":0.15,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.73,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":0.95,"id":"s1","own":true,"role":"result","text":"We show that, whereas such a scenario is consistent with current LHC observations, both future running at the LHC and a future $e^+ e^-$ linear collider could determine the sign of the Higgs coupling to $b$-quark pairs.","hedge":{"p":0.66,"label":"hedged_possibility"},"own_p":0.89,"main_claim_p":0.85,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.15,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.95,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.05,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":2,"p":0.48,"id":"s2","own":false,"role":"interpretation","text":"Discrimination is possible for two reasons.","hedge":{"p":0.52,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.39,"main_claim_p":0.03,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.21,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.09,"result":0.26,"background":0.01,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.16,"interpretation":0.48}},{"i":3,"p":0.69,"id":"s3","own":true,"role":"result","text":"First, the interference between the $b$-quark and the $t$-quark loop contributions to the $ggh$ coupling changes sign.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.59,"main_claim_p":0.05,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.18,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.06,"result":0.69,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.04,"interpretation":0.21}},{"i":4,"p":0.86,"id":"s4","own":true,"role":"result","text":"Second, the charged-Higgs loop contribution to the $\\gamma \\gamma h$ coupling is large and fairly constant up to the largest charged-Higgs mass allowed by tree-level unitarity bounds when the $b$-quark Yukawa coupling has the opposite sign from that of the SM (the change in sign of the interference terms between the $b$-quark loop and the $W$ and $t$ loops having negligible impact).","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.79,"main_claim_p":0.09,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.88,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.01,"result":0.86,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.02,"interpretation":0.11}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":1.0,"text":"We show that, whereas such a scenario is consistent with current LHC observations, both future running at the LHC and a future $e^+ e^-$ linear collider could determine the sign of the Higgs coupling to $b$-quark pairs.","location":"abstract s1","hedge_strength":{"p":0.66,"label":"hedged possibility"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"OpenRouter","model":"classifier-1.13","endpoint":"https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":4536,"cost_usd_reported":0.000191},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13-20260917","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.03,"states_limitation":0.22,"human_participants":0.01,"controlled_comparison":0.4,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.15,"compares_with_prior_results":0.44,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.01},"evidential_basis":{"p":0.46,"value":"argument","probabilities":{"argument":0.46,"literature":0.0,"proof_or_derivation":0.31,"analysis_of_existing_data":0.01,"observation_or_experiment":0.0,"simulation_or_computation":0.22}},"contribution_type":{"p":0.98,"value":"theoretical result","probabilities":{"review":0.0,"method_or_tool":0.0,"empirical_study":0.0,"simulation_study":0.02,"theoretical_result":0.98,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.0}},"contribution_statement":{"p":0.99,"text":"We show that, whereas such a scenario is consistent with current LHC observations, both future running at the LHC and a future $e^+ e^-$ linear collider could determine the sign of the Higgs coupling to $b$-quark pairs.","location":"abstract s1"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v4"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":5,"sentences_in_abstract":5},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448}}