{"paper":{"title":"Constraints on and future prospects for Two-Higgs-Doublet Models in light of the LHC Higgs signal","arxiv_id":"1405.3584","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2014-05-14T17:35:49+00:00","version_compiled":"v2"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13-20260917 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v2","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":0.99,"id":"s0","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"We analyze the Two-Higgs-Doublet Models (2HDMs) of Type I and II for consistency with the latest measurements of the ~125.5 GeV Higgs-like signal at the LHC.","hedge":{"p":0.86,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.86,"main_claim_p":0.06,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.83,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.01,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.99,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":0.99,"id":"s1","own":true,"role":"method","text":"To this end, we perform scans of the 2HDM parameter space taking into account all relevant pre-LHC constraints as well as the most recent limits coming from searches for heavy Higgs-like states at the LHC.","hedge":{"p":0.97,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.94,"main_claim_p":0.03,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.11,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.99,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.01,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":2,"p":0.56,"id":"s2","own":false,"role":"contribution","text":"The current status of the 2HDMs of Type I and II is discussed assuming that the observed 125.5 GeV state is one of the two CP-even Higgs bosons, either the lighter h or the heavier H.","hedge":{"p":0.57,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.44,"main_claim_p":0.11,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.73,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.29,"result":0.05,"background":0.01,"limitation":0.01,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.56,"interpretation":0.08}},{"i":3,"p":0.71,"id":"s3","own":true,"role":"future_work","text":"Implications for future experiments, including expectations regarding other lighter or heavier Higgs bosons are given.","hedge":{"p":0.82,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.75,"main_claim_p":0.09,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.04,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.03,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.71,"contribution":0.09,"interpretation":0.17}},{"i":4,"p":0.82,"id":"s4","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"The possible importance of heavier Higgs bosons feeding the signals for the 125.5 GeV state is also evaluated.","hedge":{"p":0.93,"label":"hedged_possibility"},"own_p":0.83,"main_claim_p":0.08,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.05,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.01,"result":0.09,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.82,"interpretation":0.08}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":0.59,"text":"The current status of the 2HDMs of Type I and II is discussed assuming that the observed 125.5 GeV state is one of the two CP-even Higgs bosons, either the lighter h or the heavier H.","location":"abstract s2","hedge_strength":{"p":0.57,"label":"asserted"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"OpenRouter","model":"classifier-1.13","endpoint":"https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":4375,"cost_usd_reported":0.000184},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13-20260917","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.02,"states_limitation":0.18,"human_participants":0.01,"controlled_comparison":0.05,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.26,"compares_with_prior_results":0.18,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.02},"evidential_basis":{"p":0.74,"value":"analysis of existing data","probabilities":{"argument":0.0,"literature":0.0,"proof_or_derivation":0.0,"analysis_of_existing_data":0.74,"observation_or_experiment":0.0,"simulation_or_computation":0.26}},"contribution_type":{"p":0.8,"value":"simulation study","probabilities":{"review":0.04,"method_or_tool":0.0,"empirical_study":0.0,"simulation_study":0.8,"theoretical_result":0.16,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.0}},"contribution_statement":{"p":0.91,"text":"To this end, we perform scans of the 2HDM parameter space taking into account all relevant pre-LHC constraints as well as the most recent limits coming from searches for heavy Higgs-like states at the LHC.","location":"abstract s1"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v2"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":5,"sentences_in_abstract":5},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448}}