{"paper":{"title":"Resolving the Tevatron Top Quark Forward-Backward Asymmetry Puzzle: Fully Differential Next-to-Next-to-Leading-Order Calculation","arxiv_id":"1411.3007","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2014-11-11T22:45:33+00:00","version_compiled":"v2"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13-20260917 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v2","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":0.93,"id":"s0","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"We determine the dominant missing Standard Model (SM) contribution to the top quark pair forward-backward asymmetry at the Tevatron.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.95,"main_claim_p":0.44,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.04,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.06,"method":0.0,"result":0.01,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.93,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":0.99,"id":"s1","own":true,"role":"result","text":"Contrary to past expectations, we find a large, around 27%, shift relative to the well-known value of the inclusive asymmetry in next-to-leading order (NLO) QCD.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.96,"main_claim_p":0.29,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.99,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.99,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.01}},{"i":2,"p":1.0,"id":"s2","own":true,"role":"result","text":"Combining all known Standard Model corrections, we find that AFB^{SM} = 0.095 +- 0.007.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.96,"main_claim_p":0.63,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.98,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":1.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":3,"p":0.51,"id":"s3","own":true,"role":"interpretation","text":"This value is in agreement with the latest D0 measurement [V. M.","hedge":{"p":0.9,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.5,"main_claim_p":0.11,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.23,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.49,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.51}},{"i":4,"p":0.71,"id":"s4","own":false,"role":"result","text":"Abazov et al. (D0 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 90, 072011 (2014)] AFB^{D0} = 0.106+- 0.03 and about 1.5 sigma below that of CDF [T.","hedge":{"p":0.95,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.19,"main_claim_p":0.06,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.98,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.71,"background":0.05,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.24}},{"i":5,"p":0.55,"id":"s5","own":false,"role":"result","text":"Aaltonen et al. (CDF Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 87, 092002 (2013)] AFB^{CDF} =0.164 +- 0.047.","hedge":{"p":0.97,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.05,"main_claim_p":0.04,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.98,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.55,"background":0.38,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.07}},{"i":6,"p":0.9,"id":"s6","own":true,"role":"method","text":"Our result is derived from a fully differential calculation of the next-to-next-to leading order (NNLO) QCD corrections to inclusive top pair production at hadron colliders and includes - without any approximation - all partonic channels contributing to this process.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.96,"main_claim_p":0.1,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.21,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.9,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.1,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":7,"p":0.92,"id":"s7","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"This is the first complete fully differential calculation in NNLO QCD of a two-to-two scattering process with all coloured partons.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.92,"main_claim_p":0.08,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.22,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.03,"method":0.02,"result":0.01,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.92,"interpretation":0.02}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":0.8,"text":"Combining all known Standard Model corrections, we find that AFB^{SM} = 0.095 +- 0.007.","location":"abstract s2","hedge_strength":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"OpenRouter","model":"classifier-1.13","endpoint":"https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":6485,"cost_usd_reported":0.000272},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13-20260917","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.95,"states_limitation":0.13,"human_participants":0.01,"controlled_comparison":0.17,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.99,"compares_with_prior_results":0.98,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.02},"evidential_basis":{"p":0.87,"value":"simulation or computation","probabilities":{"argument":0.0,"literature":0.0,"proof_or_derivation":0.13,"analysis_of_existing_data":0.0,"observation_or_experiment":0.0,"simulation_or_computation":0.87}},"contribution_type":{"p":0.98,"value":"theoretical result","probabilities":{"review":0.0,"method_or_tool":0.01,"empirical_study":0.0,"simulation_study":0.01,"theoretical_result":0.98,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.0}},"contribution_statement":{"p":0.76,"text":"This is the first complete fully differential calculation in NNLO QCD of a two-to-two scattering process with all coloured partons.","location":"abstract s7"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v2"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":8,"sentences_in_abstract":8},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448}}