{"paper":{"title":"$1/m$ Corrections for Orbitally Excited Heavy Mesons and the $1/2$ - $3/2$ Puzzle","arxiv_id":"1503.00569","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2015-03-02T15:24:47+00:00","version_compiled":"v1"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13-20260917 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v1","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":0.99,"id":"s0","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"We re-investigate the effects of the $1/m_c$ corrections on the spectrum of the lowest orbitally excited $D$-meson states.","hedge":{"p":0.5,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.86,"main_claim_p":0.06,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.36,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.01,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.99,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":0.4,"id":"s1","own":false,"role":"contribution","text":"We argue that one should expect the $1/m_c$ corrections to induce a significant mixing between the two lowest lying $1^+$ states.","hedge":{"p":0.81,"label":"hedged_possibility"},"own_p":0.34,"main_claim_p":0.46,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.32,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.01,"result":0.28,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.4,"interpretation":0.31}},{"i":2,"p":0.91,"id":"s2","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"We discuss the implications of this mixing and compute its effect on the semileptonic decays $B \\to D^{**} \\ell \\bar{\\nu}$ and the strong $D^{**}$ decays.","hedge":{"p":0.96,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.91,"main_claim_p":0.18,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.05,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.01,"result":0.07,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.91,"interpretation":0.01}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":0.99,"text":"We argue that one should expect the $1/m_c$ corrections to induce a significant mixing between the two lowest lying $1^+$ states.","location":"abstract s1","hedge_strength":{"p":0.81,"label":"hedged possibility"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"OpenRouter","model":"classifier-1.13","endpoint":"https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":2997,"cost_usd_reported":0.000126},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13-20260917","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.03,"states_limitation":0.09,"human_participants":0.01,"controlled_comparison":0.03,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.06,"compares_with_prior_results":0.14,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.01},"evidential_basis":{"p":0.38,"value":"argument","probabilities":{"argument":0.38,"literature":0.0,"proof_or_derivation":0.36,"analysis_of_existing_data":0.0,"observation_or_experiment":0.0,"simulation_or_computation":0.26}},"contribution_type":{"p":1.0,"value":"theoretical result","probabilities":{"review":0.0,"method_or_tool":0.0,"empirical_study":0.0,"simulation_study":0.0,"theoretical_result":1.0,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.0}},"contribution_statement":{"p":0.56,"text":"We discuss the implications of this mixing and compute its effect on the semileptonic decays $B \\to D^{**} \\ell \\bar{\\nu}$ and the strong $D^{**}$ decays.","location":"abstract s2"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v1"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":3,"sentences_in_abstract":3},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448}}