{"paper":{"title":"On sgoldstino interpretation of the diphoton excess","arxiv_id":"1512.05723","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2015-12-17T19:04:12+00:00","version_compiled":"v2"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13.0 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v2","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":0.63,"id":"s0","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"We point out that the diphoton excess at about 750 GeV recently discovered by the LHC experiments can be explained within supersymmetric models with low scale supersymmetry breaking with sgoldstino as a natural candidate.","hedge":{"p":0.57,"label":"hedged_possibility"},"own_p":0.63,"main_claim_p":0.9,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.96,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.19,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.63,"interpretation":0.18}},{"i":1,"p":0.94,"id":"s1","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"We discuss phenomenological consequences of this scenario describing possible signatures to test this hypothesis.","hedge":{"p":0.5,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.79,"main_claim_p":0.08,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.02,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.01,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.05,"contribution":0.94,"interpretation":0.0}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":1.0,"text":"We point out that the diphoton excess at about 750 GeV recently discovered by the LHC experiments can be explained within supersymmetric models with low scale supersymmetry breaking with sgoldstino as a natural candidate.","location":"abstract s0","hedge_strength":{"p":0.57,"label":"hedged possibility"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"TypeSafe API","model":"classifier-1.13.0","endpoint":"https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":2295,"cost_usd_reported":0.0},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13.0","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.03,"states_limitation":0.06,"human_participants":0.02,"controlled_comparison":0.02,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.5,"compares_with_prior_results":0.08,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.02},"evidential_basis":{"p":0.78,"value":"argument","probabilities":{"argument":0.78,"literature":0.06,"proof_or_derivation":0.01,"analysis_of_existing_data":0.11,"observation_or_experiment":0.04,"simulation_or_computation":0.0}},"contribution_type":{"p":0.65,"value":"theoretical result","probabilities":{"review":0.0,"method_or_tool":0.0,"empirical_study":0.0,"simulation_study":0.0,"theoretical_result":0.65,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.35}},"contribution_statement":{"p":0.98,"text":"We point out that the diphoton excess at about 750 GeV recently discovered by the LHC experiments can be explained within supersymmetric models with low scale supersymmetry breaking with sgoldstino as a natural candidate.","location":"abstract s0"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v2"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":2,"sentences_in_abstract":2},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448}}