{"paper":{"title":"Diffractive and non-diffractive wounded nucleons and final states in pA collisions","arxiv_id":"1607.04434","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2016-07-15T09:47:32+00:00","version_compiled":"v2"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13.0 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v2","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":0.98,"id":"s0","own":false,"role":"background","text":"We review the state-of-the-art of Glauber-inspired models for estimating the distribution of the number of participating nucleons in pA and AA collisions.","hedge":{"p":0.82,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.17,"main_claim_p":0.04,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.06,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.98,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.02,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":0.92,"id":"s1","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"We argue that there is room for improvement in these models when it comes to the treatment of diffractive excitation processes, and present a new simple Glauber-like model where these processes are better taken into account.","hedge":{"p":0.59,"label":"hedged_possibility"},"own_p":0.84,"main_claim_p":0.38,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.13,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.08,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.92,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":2,"p":0.91,"id":"s2","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"We also suggest a new way of using the number of participating, or wounded, nucleons to extrapolate event characteristics from pp collisions, and hence get an estimate of basic hadronic final-state properties in pA collisions, which may be used to extract possible nuclear effects.","hedge":{"p":0.99,"label":"hedged_possibility"},"own_p":0.75,"main_claim_p":0.32,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.05,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.09,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.91,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":3,"p":0.99,"id":"s3","own":true,"role":"method","text":"The new method is inspired by the Fritiof model, but based on the full, semi-hard multiparton interaction model of Pythia 8.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.54,"main_claim_p":0.07,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.12,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.99,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.01,"interpretation":0.0}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":0.84,"text":"We argue that there is room for improvement in these models when it comes to the treatment of diffractive excitation processes, and present a new simple Glauber-like model where these processes are better taken into account.","location":"abstract s1","hedge_strength":{"p":0.59,"label":"hedged possibility"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"TypeSafe API","model":"classifier-1.13.0","endpoint":"https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":3740,"cost_usd_reported":0.0},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13.0","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.05,"states_limitation":0.2,"human_participants":0.01,"controlled_comparison":0.09,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.04,"compares_with_prior_results":0.62,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.02},"evidential_basis":{"p":0.78,"value":"argument","probabilities":{"argument":0.78,"literature":0.05,"proof_or_derivation":0.0,"analysis_of_existing_data":0.0,"observation_or_experiment":0.0,"simulation_or_computation":0.17}},"contribution_type":{"p":0.89,"value":"method or tool","probabilities":{"review":0.03,"method_or_tool":0.89,"empirical_study":0.0,"simulation_study":0.0,"theoretical_result":0.08,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.0}},"contribution_statement":{"p":0.61,"text":"We argue that there is room for improvement in these models when it comes to the treatment of diffractive excitation processes, and present a new simple Glauber-like model where these processes are better taken into account.","location":"abstract s1"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v2"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":4,"sentences_in_abstract":4},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448}}