{"paper":{"title":"Qubit Transport Model for Unitary Black Hole Evaporation without Firewalls","arxiv_id":"1607.04642","primary_cat":"hep-th","submitted_at":"2016-07-15T20:00:01+00:00","version_compiled":"v5"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13.0 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v5","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":0.97,"id":"s0","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"We give an explicit toy qubit transport model for transferring information from the gravitational field of a black hole to the Hawking radiation by a continuous unitary transformation of the outgoing radiation and the black hole gravitational field.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.93,"main_claim_p":0.61,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.05,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.03,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.97,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":0.65,"id":"s1","own":true,"role":"result","text":"The model has no firewalls or other drama at the event horizon, and it avoids a counterargument that has been raised for subsystem transfer models as resolutions of the firewall paradox.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.81,"main_claim_p":0.25,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.14,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.65,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.2,"interpretation":0.15}},{"i":2,"p":0.85,"id":"s2","own":true,"role":"result","text":"Furthermore, it fits the set of six physical constraints that Giddings has proposed for models of black hole evaporation.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.71,"main_claim_p":0.09,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.89,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.85,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.12,"interpretation":0.03}},{"i":3,"p":0.53,"id":"s3","own":true,"role":"method","text":"It does utilize nonlocal qubits for the gravitational field but assumes that the radiation interacts locally with these nonlocal qubits, so in some sense the nonlocality is confined to the gravitational sector.","hedge":{"p":0.95,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.78,"main_claim_p":0.07,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.08,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.53,"result":0.01,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.21,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.05,"interpretation":0.2}},{"i":4,"p":1.0,"id":"s4","own":true,"role":"limitation","text":"Although the qubit model is too crude to be quantitively correct for the detailed spectrum of Hawking radiation, it fits qualitatively with what is expected.","hedge":{"p":0.65,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.71,"main_claim_p":0.08,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.26,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":1.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":0.61,"text":"We give an explicit toy qubit transport model for transferring information from the gravitational field of a black hole to the Hawking radiation by a continuous unitary transformation of the outgoing radiation and the black hole gravitational field.","location":"abstract s0","hedge_strength":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"TypeSafe API","model":"classifier-1.13.0","endpoint":"https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":4347,"cost_usd_reported":0.0},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13.0","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.05,"states_limitation":0.97,"human_participants":0.01,"controlled_comparison":0.03,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.1,"compares_with_prior_results":0.6,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.02},"evidential_basis":{"p":0.74,"value":"argument","probabilities":{"argument":0.74,"literature":0.0,"proof_or_derivation":0.24,"analysis_of_existing_data":0.0,"observation_or_experiment":0.0,"simulation_or_computation":0.02}},"contribution_type":{"p":0.98,"value":"theoretical result","probabilities":{"review":0.0,"method_or_tool":0.02,"empirical_study":0.0,"simulation_study":0.0,"theoretical_result":0.98,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.0}},"contribution_statement":{"p":1.0,"text":"We give an explicit toy qubit transport model for transferring information from the gravitational field of a black hole to the Hawking radiation by a continuous unitary transformation of the outgoing radiation and the black hole gravitational field.","location":"abstract s0"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v5"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":5,"sentences_in_abstract":5},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448}}