{"paper":{"title":"Scrutinizing a di-photon resonance at the LHC through Moscow zero","arxiv_id":"1608.04755","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2016-08-16T20:01:23+00:00","version_compiled":"v2"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13.0 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v2","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":1.0,"id":"s0","own":false,"role":"background","text":"The ATLAS and CMS collaborations have recently released their new analyses of the diphoton searches.","hedge":{"p":0.99,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.04,"main_claim_p":0.02,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.05,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":1.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":0.76,"id":"s1","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"We look in detail the consequences of their results deriving strong constraints on models where a scalar resonance $s$ decays into two light pseudoscalars which in turn decay into two pairs of collimated photons, mis-identified with two real photons.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.9,"main_claim_p":0.49,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.21,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.01,"result":0.21,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.76,"interpretation":0.02}},{"i":2,"p":0.75,"id":"s2","own":true,"role":"method","text":"In our construction, all mass terms are generated dynamically, and only one pair of vector-like fermions generate couplings which will be probed using the upcoming LHC data.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.77,"main_claim_p":0.09,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.69,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.75,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.25,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":3,"p":0.82,"id":"s3","own":true,"role":"result","text":"Moreover, we show that a stable dark matter candidate, respecting the cosmological constraints, is naturally affordable in the model.","hedge":{"p":0.98,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.86,"main_claim_p":0.15,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.06,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.82,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.14,"interpretation":0.04}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":0.92,"text":"We look in detail the consequences of their results deriving strong constraints on models where a scalar resonance $s$ decays into two light pseudoscalars which in turn decay into two pairs of collimated photons, mis-identified with two real photons.","location":"abstract s1","hedge_strength":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"TypeSafe API","model":"classifier-1.13.0","endpoint":"https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":3624,"cost_usd_reported":0.0},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13.0","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.03,"states_limitation":0.17,"human_participants":0.01,"controlled_comparison":0.05,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.08,"compares_with_prior_results":0.56,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.02},"evidential_basis":{"p":0.97,"value":"analysis of existing data","probabilities":{"argument":0.01,"literature":0.02,"proof_or_derivation":0.0,"analysis_of_existing_data":0.97,"observation_or_experiment":0.0,"simulation_or_computation":0.0}},"contribution_type":{"p":0.94,"value":"theoretical result","probabilities":{"review":0.0,"method_or_tool":0.0,"empirical_study":0.0,"simulation_study":0.0,"theoretical_result":0.94,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.06}},"contribution_statement":{"p":0.96,"text":"We look in detail the consequences of their results deriving strong constraints on models where a scalar resonance $s$ decays into two light pseudoscalars which in turn decay into two pairs of collimated photons, mis-identified with two real photons.","location":"abstract s1"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v2"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":4,"sentences_in_abstract":4},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448}}