{"paper":{"title":"Assessing distances and consistency of kinematics in Gaia/TGAS","arxiv_id":"1704.01333","primary_cat":"astro-ph.GA","submitted_at":"2017-04-05T09:41:31+00:00","version_compiled":"v2"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13.0 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v2","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":0.8,"id":"s0","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"We apply the statistical methods by Schoenrich, Binney & Asplund to assess the quality of distances and kinematics in the RAVE-TGAS and LAMOST-TGAS samples of Solar neighbourhood stars.","hedge":{"p":0.96,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.91,"main_claim_p":0.06,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.06,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.2,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.8,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":0.76,"id":"s1","own":false,"role":"result","text":"These methods yield a nominal distance accuracy of 1-2%.","hedge":{"p":0.99,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.42,"main_claim_p":0.1,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.99,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.13,"result":0.76,"background":0.08,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.02,"interpretation":0.01}},{"i":2,"p":0.55,"id":"s2","own":false,"role":"method","text":"Other than common tests on parallax accuracy, they directly test distance estimations including the effects of distance priors.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.28,"main_claim_p":0.06,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.1,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.04,"method":0.55,"result":0.0,"background":0.04,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.37,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":3,"p":0.83,"id":"s3","own":true,"role":"method","text":"We show how to construct these priors including the survey selection functions (SSFs) directly from the data.","hedge":{"p":0.99,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.91,"main_claim_p":0.05,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.05,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.83,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.17,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":4,"p":0.98,"id":"s4","own":true,"role":"result","text":"We demonstrate that neglecting the SSFs causes severe distance biases.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.91,"main_claim_p":0.17,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.09,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.98,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.01,"interpretation":0.01}},{"i":5,"p":0.89,"id":"s5","own":true,"role":"result","text":"Due to the decline of the SSFs in distance, the simple 1/parallax estimate only mildly underestimates distances.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.82,"main_claim_p":0.07,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.75,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.89,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.11}},{"i":6,"p":0.98,"id":"s6","own":true,"role":"method","text":"We test the accuracy of measured line-of-sight velocities (v_los) by binning the samples in the nominal v_los uncertainties.","hedge":{"p":0.87,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.92,"main_claim_p":0.04,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.12,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.98,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.02,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":7,"p":1.0,"id":"s7","own":true,"role":"result","text":"We find: a) the LAMOST v_los have a ~ -5 km/s offset; b) the average LAMOST measurement error for v_los is ~7 km/s, significantly smaller than, and nearly uncorrelated with the nominal LAMOST estimates.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.97,"main_claim_p":0.15,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.99,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":1.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":8,"p":0.94,"id":"s8","own":true,"role":"result","text":"The RAVE sample shows either a moderate distance underestimate, or an unaccounted source of v_los dispersion (e_v) from measurement errors and binary stars.","hedge":{"p":0.8,"label":"hedged_possibility"},"own_p":0.9,"main_claim_p":0.15,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.15,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.94,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.06}},{"i":9,"p":1.0,"id":"s9","own":true,"role":"result","text":"For a subsample of suspected binary stars in RAVE, our methods indicate significant distance underestimates.","hedge":{"p":0.76,"label":"hedged_possibility"},"own_p":0.96,"main_claim_p":0.06,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.13,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":1.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":10,"p":0.7,"id":"s10","own":true,"role":"method","text":"Separating a sample in metallicity or kinematics to select thick-disc/halo stars, discriminates between distance bias and e_v.","hedge":{"p":0.97,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.84,"main_claim_p":0.11,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.22,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.7,"result":0.11,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.12,"interpretation":0.07}},{"i":11,"p":0.94,"id":"s11","own":true,"role":"result","text":"For LAMOST, this separation yields consistency with pure v_los measurement errors.","hedge":{"p":0.63,"label":"hedged_possibility"},"own_p":0.95,"main_claim_p":0.08,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.11,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.94,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.06}},{"i":12,"p":0.91,"id":"s12","own":true,"role":"result","text":"We find an anomaly near longitude l~(300+/-60)deg and distance s~(0.32+/-0.03)kpc on both sides of the galactic plane, which could be explained by either a localised distance error or a breathing mode.","hedge":{"p":0.89,"label":"hedged_possibility"},"own_p":0.93,"main_claim_p":0.08,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.96,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.91,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.09}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":0.65,"text":"We demonstrate that neglecting the SSFs causes severe distance biases.","location":"abstract s4","hedge_strength":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"TypeSafe API","model":"classifier-1.13.0","endpoint":"https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":9604,"cost_usd_reported":0.0},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13.0","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.04,"states_limitation":0.72,"human_participants":0.02,"controlled_comparison":0.22,"randomized_assignment":0.02,"states_quantitative_result":0.99,"compares_with_prior_results":0.73,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.03},"evidential_basis":{"p":1.0,"value":"analysis of existing data","probabilities":{"argument":0.0,"literature":0.0,"proof_or_derivation":0.0,"analysis_of_existing_data":1.0,"observation_or_experiment":0.0,"simulation_or_computation":0.0}},"contribution_type":{"p":0.66,"value":"empirical study","probabilities":{"review":0.0,"method_or_tool":0.34,"empirical_study":0.66,"simulation_study":0.0,"theoretical_result":0.0,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.0}},"contribution_statement":{"p":0.88,"text":"We show how to construct these priors including the survey selection functions (SSFs) directly from the data.","location":"abstract s3"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v2"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":13,"sentences_in_abstract":13},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448}}