{"paper":{"title":"Testing gravity on cosmological scales with cosmic shear, cosmic microwave background anisotropies, and redshift-space distortions","arxiv_id":"1712.01846","primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","submitted_at":"2017-12-05T19:00:03+00:00","version_compiled":"v3"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13.0 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v3","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":0.51,"id":"s0","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"We use a range of cosmological data to constrain phenomenological modifications to general relativity on cosmological scales, through modifications to the Poisson and lensing equations.","hedge":{"p":0.95,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.92,"main_claim_p":0.04,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.05,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.49,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.51,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":1.0,"id":"s1","own":true,"role":"method","text":"We include cosmic microwave background anisotropy measurements from the Planck satellite, cosmic shear from CFHTLenS and DES-SV, and redshift-space distortions from BOSS data release 12 and the 6dF galaxy survey.","hedge":{"p":0.98,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.52,"main_claim_p":0.02,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.23,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":1.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":2,"p":1.0,"id":"s2","own":true,"role":"result","text":"We find no evidence of departures from general relativity, with the modified gravity parameters constrained to $\\Sigma_0 = 0.05^{+0.05}_{-0.07}$ and $\\mu_0 = -0.10^{+0.20}_{-0.16}$, where $\\Sigma_0$ and $\\mu_0$ refer to deviations from general relativity today and are defined to be zero in general relativity.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.97,"main_claim_p":0.94,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.99,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":1.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":3,"p":0.41,"id":"s3","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"We also forecast the sensitivity to those parameters of the full five-year Dark Energy Survey and of an experiment like the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope, showing a substantial expected improvement in the constraint on $\\Sigma_0$.","hedge":{"p":0.9,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.88,"main_claim_p":0.03,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.24,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.36,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.23,"contribution":0.41,"interpretation":0.0}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":1.0,"text":"We find no evidence of departures from general relativity, with the modified gravity parameters constrained to $\\Sigma_0 = 0.05^{+0.05}_{-0.07}$ and $\\mu_0 = -0.10^{+0.20}_{-0.16}$, where $\\Sigma_0$ and $\\mu_0$ refer to deviations from general relativity today and are defined to be zero in general relativity.","location":"abstract s2","hedge_strength":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"TypeSafe API","model":"classifier-1.13.0","endpoint":"https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":3945,"cost_usd_reported":0.0},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13.0","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.02,"states_limitation":0.22,"human_participants":0.02,"controlled_comparison":0.3,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.99,"compares_with_prior_results":0.42,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.02},"evidential_basis":{"p":1.0,"value":"analysis of existing data","probabilities":{"argument":0.0,"literature":0.0,"proof_or_derivation":0.0,"analysis_of_existing_data":1.0,"observation_or_experiment":0.0,"simulation_or_computation":0.0}},"contribution_type":{"p":1.0,"value":"empirical study","probabilities":{"review":0.0,"method_or_tool":0.0,"empirical_study":1.0,"simulation_study":0.0,"theoretical_result":0.0,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.0}},"contribution_statement":{"p":0.68,"text":"We use a range of cosmological data to constrain phenomenological modifications to general relativity on cosmological scales, through modifications to the Poisson and lensing equations.","location":"abstract s0"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v3"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":4,"sentences_in_abstract":4},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448}}