{"paper":{"title":"Discrepancy in tidal deformability of GW170817 between the Advanced LIGO twin detectors","arxiv_id":"1812.06100","primary_cat":"astro-ph.HE","submitted_at":"2018-12-14T19:00:01+00:00","version_compiled":"v3"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13.0 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v3","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":0.99,"id":"s0","own":true,"role":"result","text":"We find that the Hanford and Livingston detectors of Advanced LIGO derive a distinct posterior probability distribution of binary tidal deformability tilde{Lambda} of the first binary-neutron-star merger GW170817.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.96,"main_claim_p":0.7,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.41,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.99,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.01,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":0.68,"id":"s1","own":true,"role":"result","text":"By analyzing public data of GW170817 with a nested-sampling engine and the default TaylorF2 waveform provided by the LALInference package, the probability distribution of the binary tidal deformability derived by the LIGO-Virgo detector network turns out to be determined dominantly by the Hanford detector.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.9,"main_claim_p":0.31,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.4,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.28,"result":0.68,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.03,"interpretation":0.01}},{"i":2,"p":1.0,"id":"s2","own":true,"role":"result","text":"Specifically, by imposing the flat prior on tidal deformability of individual stars, symmetric 90% credible intervals of tilde{Lambda} are estimated to be 527^{+619}_{-345} with the Hanford detector, 927^{+522}_{-619} with the Livingston detector, and 455^{+668}_{-281} with the LIGO-Virgo detector network.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.93,"main_claim_p":0.22,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.99,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":1.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":3,"p":1.0,"id":"s3","own":true,"role":"result","text":"Furthermore, the distribution derived by the Livingston detector changes irregularly when we vary the maximum frequency of the data used in the analysis.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.94,"main_claim_p":0.07,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.08,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":1.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":4,"p":1.0,"id":"s4","own":true,"role":"result","text":"This feature is not observed for the Hanford detector.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.88,"main_claim_p":0.05,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.14,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":1.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":5,"p":0.67,"id":"s5","own":true,"role":"interpretation","text":"While they are all consistent, the discrepancy and irregular behavior suggest that an in-depth study of noise properties might improve our understanding of GW170817 and future events.","hedge":{"p":0.66,"label":"hedged_possibility"},"own_p":0.63,"main_claim_p":0.66,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.1,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.33,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.67}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":0.66,"text":"We find that the Hanford and Livingston detectors of Advanced LIGO derive a distinct posterior probability distribution of binary tidal deformability tilde{Lambda} of the first binary-neutron-star merger GW170817.","location":"abstract s0","hedge_strength":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"TypeSafe API","model":"classifier-1.13.0","endpoint":"https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":5295,"cost_usd_reported":0.0},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13.0","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.04,"states_limitation":0.76,"human_participants":0.01,"controlled_comparison":0.12,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.98,"compares_with_prior_results":0.43,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.05},"evidential_basis":{"p":1.0,"value":"analysis of existing data","probabilities":{"argument":0.0,"literature":0.0,"proof_or_derivation":0.0,"analysis_of_existing_data":1.0,"observation_or_experiment":0.0,"simulation_or_computation":0.0}},"contribution_type":{"p":0.88,"value":"empirical study","probabilities":{"review":0.0,"method_or_tool":0.0,"empirical_study":0.88,"simulation_study":0.11,"theoretical_result":0.0,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.01}},"contribution_statement":{"p":0.53,"text":"By analyzing public data of GW170817 with a nested-sampling engine and the default TaylorF2 waveform provided by the LALInference package, the probability distribution of the binary tidal deformability derived by the LIGO-Virgo detector network turns out to be determined dominantly by the Hanford detector.","location":"abstract s1"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v3"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":6,"sentences_in_abstract":6},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448}}