{"paper":{"title":"The K2-OjOS Project: New and revisited planets and candidates in K2 campaigns 5, 16, & 18","arxiv_id":"2109.03346","primary_cat":"astro-ph.EP","submitted_at":"2021-09-07T21:36:32+00:00","version_compiled":"v2"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13.0 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v2","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":0.97,"id":"s0","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"We present the first results of K2-OjOS, a collaborative project between professional and amateur astronomers primarily aimed to detect, characterize, and validate new extrasolar planets.","hedge":{"p":0.99,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.63,"main_claim_p":0.06,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.11,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.03,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.97,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":0.96,"id":"s1","own":true,"role":"method","text":"For this work, 10 amateur astronomers looked for planetary signals by visually inspecting the 20 427 light curves of K2 campaign 18 (C18).","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.81,"main_claim_p":0.02,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.99,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.96,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.04,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":2,"p":0.98,"id":"s2","own":true,"role":"result","text":"They found 42 planet candidates, of which 18 are new detections and 24 had been detected in the overlapping C5 by previous works.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.93,"main_claim_p":0.07,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.99,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.98,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.02,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":3,"p":1.0,"id":"s3","own":true,"role":"method","text":"We used archival photometric and spectroscopic observations, as well as new high-spatial resolution images in order to carry out a complete analysis of the candidates found, including a homogeneous characterization of the host stars, transit modelling, search for transit timing variations and statistical validation.","hedge":{"p":0.98,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.94,"main_claim_p":0.03,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.05,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":1.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":4,"p":0.99,"id":"s4","own":true,"role":"result","text":"As a result, we report four new planets (K2-355 b, K2-356 b, K2-357 b, and K2-358 b) and 14 planet candidates.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.96,"main_claim_p":0.63,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.98,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.99,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.01,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":5,"p":0.66,"id":"s5","own":true,"role":"result","text":"Besides, we refine the transit ephemeris of the previously published planets and candidates by modelling C5, C16 (when available) and C18 photometric data jointly, largely improving the period and mid-transit time precision.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.96,"main_claim_p":0.08,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.25,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.12,"result":0.66,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.22,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":6,"p":0.91,"id":"s6","own":true,"role":"result","text":"Regarding individual systems, we highlight the new planet K2-356 b and candidate EPIC 211537087.02 being near a 2:1 period commensurability, the detection of significant TTVs in the bright star K2-184 (V = 10.35), the location of K2-103 b inside the habitable zone according to optimistic models, the detection of a new single transit in the known system K2-274, and the disposition reassignment of K2-120 b, which we consider as a planet candidate as the origin of the signal cannot be ascertained.","hedge":{"p":0.94,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.95,"main_claim_p":0.09,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.94,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.91,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.01,"interpretation":0.08}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":1.0,"text":"As a result, we report four new planets (K2-355 b, K2-356 b, K2-357 b, and K2-358 b) and 14 planet candidates.","location":"abstract s4","hedge_strength":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"TypeSafe API","model":"classifier-1.13.0","endpoint":"https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":6117,"cost_usd_reported":0.0},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13.0","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.42,"states_limitation":0.8,"human_participants":0.47,"controlled_comparison":0.05,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.99,"compares_with_prior_results":0.84,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.03},"evidential_basis":{"p":0.88,"value":"analysis of existing data","probabilities":{"argument":0.0,"literature":0.0,"proof_or_derivation":0.0,"analysis_of_existing_data":0.88,"observation_or_experiment":0.12,"simulation_or_computation":0.0}},"contribution_type":{"p":0.98,"value":"empirical study","probabilities":{"review":0.0,"method_or_tool":0.0,"empirical_study":0.98,"simulation_study":0.0,"theoretical_result":0.0,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.02,"position_or_commentary":0.0}},"contribution_statement":{"p":0.49,"text":"As a result, we report four new planets (K2-355 b, K2-356 b, K2-357 b, and K2-358 b) and 14 planet candidates.","location":"abstract s4"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v2"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":7,"sentences_in_abstract":7},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448}}