{"paper":{"title":"Entanglement entropy in quantum spin chains with broken parity number symmetry","arxiv_id":"2109.06359","primary_cat":"cond-mat.str-el","submitted_at":"2021-09-13T23:17:10+00:00","version_compiled":"v3"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13.0 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v3","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":0.99,"id":"s0","own":false,"role":"background","text":"Consider a generic quantum spin chain that can be mapped to free quadratic fermions via Jordan-Wigner (JW) transformation.","hedge":{"p":0.78,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.11,"main_claim_p":0.02,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.05,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.01,"result":0.0,"background":0.99,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":0.79,"id":"s1","own":false,"role":"background","text":"In the presence of arbitrary boundary magnetic fields, this Hamiltonian is no longer a quadratic Hamiltonian after JW transformation.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.25,"main_claim_p":0.03,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.1,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.13,"method":0.0,"result":0.07,"background":0.79,"limitation":0.01,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":2,"p":0.98,"id":"s2","own":true,"role":"method","text":"Using ancillary sites and enlarging the Hamiltonian we first introduce a bigger quadratic Hamiltonian.","hedge":{"p":0.98,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.92,"main_claim_p":0.03,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.06,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.98,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.02,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":3,"p":0.79,"id":"s3","own":true,"role":"result","text":"Then we diagonalize this enlarged Hamiltonian in its most generic form and show that all the states are degenerate because of the presence of a zero mode.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.93,"main_claim_p":0.1,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.22,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.16,"result":0.79,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.05,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":4,"p":0.77,"id":"s4","own":true,"role":"method","text":"The eigenstates of the original spin chain with boundary magnetic fields can be derived after appropriate projection.","hedge":{"p":0.99,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.77,"main_claim_p":0.06,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.03,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.77,"result":0.14,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.09,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":5,"p":0.94,"id":"s5","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"We study in-depth the properties of the eigenstates of the enlarged Hamiltonian.","hedge":{"p":0.82,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.93,"main_claim_p":0.04,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.03,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.06,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.94,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":6,"p":0.82,"id":"s6","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"In particular, we find: 1) the eigenstates in configuration bases, 2) calculate all the correlation functions, 3) find the reduced density matrices, 4) calculate the entanglement entropy.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.96,"main_claim_p":0.08,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.45,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.14,"result":0.04,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.82,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":7,"p":0.8,"id":"s7","own":true,"role":"result","text":"We show that the generic eigenstate of the enlarged Hamiltonian (including the eigenstates of the original spin chain) breaks the parity number symmetry and consequently one needs to take care of some technicalities regarding the calculation of the reduced density matrix and entanglement entropy.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.92,"main_claim_p":0.41,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.06,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.8,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.01,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.02,"interpretation":0.17}},{"i":8,"p":0.95,"id":"s8","own":true,"role":"result","text":"Interestingly we show that the entanglement structure of these eigenstates is quite universal and independent of the Hamiltonian.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.95,"main_claim_p":0.51,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.11,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.95,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.05}},{"i":9,"p":0.61,"id":"s9","own":true,"role":"method","text":"We support our results by applying them to a couple of examples.","hedge":{"p":0.95,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.92,"main_claim_p":0.04,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.09,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.61,"result":0.03,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.36,"interpretation":0.0}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":0.97,"text":"Interestingly we show that the entanglement structure of these eigenstates is quite universal and independent of the Hamiltonian.","location":"abstract s8","hedge_strength":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"TypeSafe API","model":"classifier-1.13.0","endpoint":"https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":7561,"cost_usd_reported":0.0},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13.0","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.05,"states_limitation":0.62,"human_participants":0.01,"controlled_comparison":0.02,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.06,"compares_with_prior_results":0.07,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.02},"evidential_basis":{"p":1.0,"value":"proof or derivation","probabilities":{"argument":0.0,"literature":0.0,"proof_or_derivation":1.0,"analysis_of_existing_data":0.0,"observation_or_experiment":0.0,"simulation_or_computation":0.0}},"contribution_type":{"p":0.91,"value":"theoretical result","probabilities":{"review":0.0,"method_or_tool":0.09,"empirical_study":0.0,"simulation_study":0.0,"theoretical_result":0.91,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.0}},"contribution_statement":{"p":0.52,"text":"Using ancillary sites and enlarging the Hamiltonian we first introduce a bigger quadratic Hamiltonian.","location":"abstract s2"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v3"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":10,"sentences_in_abstract":10},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448}}