{"paper":{"title":"Revisiting the Parameter Space of Binary Neutron Star Merger Event GW170817","arxiv_id":"2302.11394","primary_cat":"astro-ph.HE","submitted_at":"2023-02-22T14:22:29+00:00","version_compiled":"v1"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13.0 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v1","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":1.0,"id":"s0","own":false,"role":"background","text":"Since the gravitational wave event GW170817 and gamma-ray burst GW170817A there have been numerous studies constraining the burst properties through analysis of the afterglow light curves.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.04,"main_claim_p":0.01,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.18,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":1.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":1.0,"id":"s1","own":false,"role":"background","text":"Most agree that the burst was viewed off-axis with a ratio of the observer angle to the jet angle ($\\theta_{obs}/\\theta_j$) between 4 - 6.","hedge":{"p":0.89,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.04,"main_claim_p":0.05,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.99,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":1.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":2,"p":0.68,"id":"s2","own":true,"role":"method","text":"We use a parameterized model and broadband synchrotron data up to $\\sim 800$ days post-merger to constrain parameters of the burst.","hedge":{"p":0.98,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.95,"main_claim_p":0.03,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.88,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.68,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.32,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":3,"p":0.99,"id":"s3","own":true,"role":"method","text":"To reproduce the hydrodynamics of a gamma-ray burst outflow we use a two-parameter \"boosted fireball\" model.","hedge":{"p":0.99,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.79,"main_claim_p":0.02,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.65,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.99,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.01,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":4,"p":0.93,"id":"s4","own":false,"role":"method","text":"The structure of a boosted fireball is determined by the specific internal energy, $\\eta_0$, and the bulk Lorentz factor, $\\gamma_B(\\sim 1/\\theta_j)$ with shapes varying smoothly from a quasi-spherical outflow for low values of $\\gamma_B$ to a highly collimated jet for high values.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.12,"main_claim_p":0.03,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.54,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.93,"result":0.0,"background":0.07,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":5,"p":0.99,"id":"s5","own":true,"role":"method","text":"We run simulations with $\\gamma_B$ in the range $1-20$ and $\\eta_0$ in the range $2-15$.","hedge":{"p":0.97,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.95,"main_claim_p":0.02,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.98,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.99,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.01,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":6,"p":1.0,"id":"s6","own":true,"role":"method","text":"To calculate light curves we use a synchrotron radiation model characterized by $F_{peak}$, $\\nu_m$, and $\\nu_c$ and calculate millions of spectra at different times and $\\theta_{obs}$ values using the \\texttt{boxfit} radiation code.","hedge":{"p":0.99,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.94,"main_claim_p":0.02,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.52,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":1.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":7,"p":0.98,"id":"s7","own":true,"role":"method","text":"We can tabulate the spectral parameter values from our spectra and rapidly generate arbitrary light curves for comparison to data in MCMC analysis.","hedge":{"p":0.77,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.93,"main_claim_p":0.03,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.12,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.98,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.02,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":8,"p":1.0,"id":"s8","own":true,"role":"result","text":"We find that our model prefers a gamma-ray burst with jet energy $E_j\\sim10^{50}$ ergs and with an observer angle of $\\theta_{obs}=0.65^{+0.13}_{-0.14}$ radians and ratio to jet opening angle of ($\\theta_{obs}/\\theta_j$) = 5.4$^{+0.53}_{-0.38}$.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.97,"main_claim_p":0.93,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.99,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":1.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":1.0,"text":"We find that our model prefers a gamma-ray burst with jet energy $E_j\\sim10^{50}$ ergs and with an observer angle of $\\theta_{obs}=0.65^{+0.13}_{-0.14}$ radians and ratio to jet opening angle of ($\\theta_{obs}/\\theta_j$) = 5.4$^{+0.53}_{-0.38}$.","location":"abstract s8","hedge_strength":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"TypeSafe API","model":"classifier-1.13.0","endpoint":"https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":7375,"cost_usd_reported":0.0},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13.0","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.03,"states_limitation":0.08,"human_participants":0.01,"controlled_comparison":0.03,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.99,"compares_with_prior_results":0.58,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.06},"evidential_basis":{"p":0.68,"value":"analysis of existing data","probabilities":{"argument":0.0,"literature":0.0,"proof_or_derivation":0.0,"analysis_of_existing_data":0.68,"observation_or_experiment":0.0,"simulation_or_computation":0.32}},"contribution_type":{"p":0.95,"value":"simulation study","probabilities":{"review":0.0,"method_or_tool":0.04,"empirical_study":0.01,"simulation_study":0.95,"theoretical_result":0.0,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.0}},"contribution_statement":{"p":0.78,"text":"We use a parameterized model and broadband synchrotron data up to $\\sim 800$ days post-merger to constrain parameters of the burst.","location":"abstract s2"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v1"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":9,"sentences_in_abstract":9},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448}}