{"paper":{"title":"On the criterion of perturbativity with the mass-dependent beta function in extended Higgs models","arxiv_id":"2310.15622","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2023-10-24T08:41:58+00:00","version_compiled":"v3"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13.0 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v3","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":1.0,"id":"s0","own":false,"role":"background","text":"In order to realize electroweak first order phase transition, a category of extended Higgs models with relatively large self-coupling constants is often considered.","hedge":{"p":0.88,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.05,"main_claim_p":0.02,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.1,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":1.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":1.0,"id":"s1","own":false,"role":"background","text":"In such a scenario, the running coupling constants can blow up at an energy scale much below the Planck scale.","hedge":{"p":0.53,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.07,"main_claim_p":0.02,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.5,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":1.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":2,"p":0.84,"id":"s2","own":false,"role":"background","text":"To clarify the allowed parameter space of the model, it is important to evaluate the scale where perturbation calculation breaks down.","hedge":{"p":0.99,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.08,"main_claim_p":0.02,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.03,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.13,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.84,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.03,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":3,"p":0.95,"id":"s3","own":false,"role":"background","text":"In the renormalization group equation analysis using the mass-independent renormalization scheme, we need the matching condition to connect the low energy theory and the high energy theory.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.11,"main_claim_p":0.02,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.04,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.01,"method":0.02,"result":0.0,"background":0.95,"limitation":0.02,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":4,"p":0.66,"id":"s4","own":false,"role":"background","text":"Consequently, the analysis depends on the detail of the matching condition.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.07,"main_claim_p":0.02,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.02,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.18,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.66,"limitation":0.15,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.01}},{"i":5,"p":0.63,"id":"s5","own":false,"role":"method","text":"On the other hand, the analysis with the mass-dependent beta function is performed in a simpler way, because the threshold effect is automatically included in the beta function.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.1,"main_claim_p":0.05,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.23,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.02,"method":0.63,"result":0.0,"background":0.28,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.06,"interpretation":0.01}},{"i":6,"p":0.87,"id":"s6","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"Therefore, in this paper, using the mass-dependent beta function at the one-loop level, we discuss the application limit of perturbation calculation.","hedge":{"p":0.89,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.89,"main_claim_p":0.08,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.3,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.13,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.87,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":7,"p":0.81,"id":"s7","own":true,"role":"method","text":"First, in a toy model with two complex scalar fields, we explain the essence of our method and compare our results with those based on the mass-independent beta function.","hedge":{"p":0.85,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.9,"main_claim_p":0.03,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.32,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.81,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.19,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":8,"p":0.67,"id":"s8","own":true,"role":"method","text":"We then apply our method to the more realistic model; i.e., the inert doublet model.","hedge":{"p":0.85,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.87,"main_claim_p":0.03,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.04,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.67,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.33,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":9,"p":1.0,"id":"s9","own":true,"role":"result","text":"We find that in our method, in which the threshold effect is automatically included, the energy scale where the perturbation calculation breaks down can be higher than the one using the mass-independent beta function, especially when the blow up scale is relatively low.","hedge":{"p":0.99,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.96,"main_claim_p":0.9,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.95,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":1.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":1.0,"text":"We find that in our method, in which the threshold effect is automatically included, the energy scale where the perturbation calculation breaks down can be higher than the one using the mass-independent beta function, especially when the blow up scale is relatively low.","location":"abstract s9","hedge_strength":{"p":0.99,"label":"asserted"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"TypeSafe API","model":"classifier-1.13.0","endpoint":"https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":7567,"cost_usd_reported":0.0},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13.0","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.04,"states_limitation":0.25,"human_participants":0.01,"controlled_comparison":0.57,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.07,"compares_with_prior_results":0.98,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.02},"evidential_basis":{"p":0.87,"value":"proof or derivation","probabilities":{"argument":0.02,"literature":0.0,"proof_or_derivation":0.87,"analysis_of_existing_data":0.0,"observation_or_experiment":0.0,"simulation_or_computation":0.11}},"contribution_type":{"p":0.55,"value":"method or tool","probabilities":{"review":0.0,"method_or_tool":0.55,"empirical_study":0.0,"simulation_study":0.01,"theoretical_result":0.44,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.0}},"contribution_statement":{"p":0.79,"text":"Therefore, in this paper, using the mass-dependent beta function at the one-loop level, we discuss the application limit of perturbation calculation.","location":"abstract s6"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v3"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":10,"sentences_in_abstract":10},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448}}