{"paper":{"title":"From the Test-Mass Limit to Binary Black-Hole Waveforms in Higher-Derivative Gravity","arxiv_id":"2609.11726","primary_cat":"gr-qc","submitted_at":"2026-09-10T15:42:38+00:00","version_compiled":"v1"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13.0 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v1","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":0.86,"id":"s0","own":false,"role":"background","text":"Many higher-derivative theories predict stronger deviations from General Relativity for lower-mass black holes, while their nonlinear field equations often prevent reliable simulations of the full binary evolution.","hedge":{"p":0.62,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.05,"main_claim_p":0.04,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.76,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.14,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.86,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":0.63,"id":"s1","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"Here we develop a route from controlled black hole perturbation theory based on the modified Teukolsky formalism to comparable-mass waveforms, using parity-even cubic gravity as a representative example.","hedge":{"p":0.99,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.94,"main_claim_p":0.07,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.09,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.37,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.63,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":2,"p":0.99,"id":"s2","own":true,"role":"result","text":"We find that the tidal response of the secondary black hole enters at the same perturbative order as the direct higher-curvature correction and is therefore essential for a consistent leading-order waveform.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.95,"main_claim_p":0.26,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.77,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.99,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.01}},{"i":3,"p":1.0,"id":"s3","own":true,"role":"result","text":"The resulting strong-field fluxes and conservative dynamics produce an accumulated inspiral dephasing that grows toward merger.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.88,"main_claim_p":0.11,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.12,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":1.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":4,"p":0.52,"id":"s4","own":true,"role":"result","text":"Embedding this test-mass information into an effective-one-body model, we construct inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms for comparable-mass binaries and find coupling-dependent dephasing and waveform-peak shifts.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.96,"main_claim_p":0.26,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.08,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.15,"result":0.52,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.33,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":5,"p":0.99,"id":"s5","own":true,"role":"interpretation","text":"Our results demonstrate how strong-field test-mass calculations can anchor waveform models for higher-derivative gravity when theory-specific numerical-relativity simulations are unavailable.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.86,"main_claim_p":0.81,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.05,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.01,"interpretation":0.99}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":0.96,"text":"Our results demonstrate how strong-field test-mass calculations can anchor waveform models for higher-derivative gravity when theory-specific numerical-relativity simulations are unavailable.","location":"abstract s5","hedge_strength":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"TypeSafe API","model":"classifier-1.13.0","endpoint":"https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":5031,"cost_usd_reported":0.0},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13.0","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.06,"states_limitation":0.52,"human_participants":0.01,"controlled_comparison":0.17,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.07,"compares_with_prior_results":0.33,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.02},"evidential_basis":{"p":0.55,"value":"proof or derivation","probabilities":{"argument":0.0,"literature":0.0,"proof_or_derivation":0.55,"analysis_of_existing_data":0.0,"observation_or_experiment":0.0,"simulation_or_computation":0.45}},"contribution_type":{"p":0.69,"value":"method or tool","probabilities":{"review":0.0,"method_or_tool":0.69,"empirical_study":0.0,"simulation_study":0.02,"theoretical_result":0.29,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.0}},"contribution_statement":{"p":0.92,"text":"Here we develop a route from controlled black hole perturbation theory based on the modified Teukolsky formalism to comparable-mass waveforms, using parity-even cubic gravity as a representative example.","location":"abstract s1"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v1"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":6,"sentences_in_abstract":6},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448}}