{"paper":{"title":"Infrared Memory of a Majorana Shutter","arxiv_id":"2610.03133","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2026-10-02T10:55:01+00:00","version_compiled":"v1"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13.0 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v1","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":1.0,"id":"s0","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"We study a finite-width Majorana shutter as a local, time-dependent scattering defect and determine which features of its infrared memory are insensitive to the microscopic spatial profile.","hedge":{"p":0.91,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.91,"main_claim_p":0.12,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.05,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":1.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":0.97,"id":"s1","own":true,"role":"result","text":"For a smooth shutter, the zero-frequency scattering matrix is fixed by the integrated coupling, while finite-width corrections vanish in the long-wavelength limit.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.71,"main_claim_p":0.08,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.42,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.97,"background":0.01,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.02,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":2,"p":0.46,"id":"s2","own":true,"role":"result","text":"A time-dependent switch then produces an infrared Bogoliubov kernel whose singular part is controlled by the change in this scattering matrix.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.66,"main_claim_p":0.06,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.06,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.26,"result":0.46,"background":0.01,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.27,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":3,"p":0.56,"id":"s3","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"We examine the many-body response through three observables.","hedge":{"p":0.52,"label":"unclear"},"own_p":0.79,"main_claim_p":0.02,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.4,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.44,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.56,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":4,"p":1.0,"id":"s4","own":true,"role":"result","text":"The overlap of the pre- and post-shutter Gaussian vacua exhibits Anderson orthogonality, with an exponent set by the scattering angle.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.83,"main_claim_p":0.07,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.1,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":1.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":5,"p":0.99,"id":"s5","own":true,"role":"result","text":"A lattice calculation of the post-quench quasiparticle number resolves its logarithmic infrared growth, reaching the predicted coefficient in the slow-switch test and reproducing the expected dependence on the scattering-angle change.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.94,"main_claim_p":0.07,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.4,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.99,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.01,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":6,"p":1.0,"id":"s6","own":true,"role":"result","text":"When the entanglement cut passes through the shutter, the entropy follows the effective-central-charge description of a conformal defect, with parameter-free agreement at the percent level, improving for the wider shutter.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.92,"main_claim_p":0.08,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.97,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":1.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":7,"p":0.99,"id":"s7","own":true,"role":"result","text":"When the shutter lies inside the interval, its contribution remains a subleading finite-size correction.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.81,"main_claim_p":0.03,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.75,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.99,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.01}},{"i":8,"p":1.0,"id":"s8","own":true,"role":"result","text":"A local bilinear correlator approaches the expected Majorana power law and shows no stable logarithmic amplitude.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.88,"main_claim_p":0.05,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.21,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":1.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":9,"p":0.97,"id":"s9","own":true,"role":"interpretation","text":"These results show that the same low-frequency scattering data control distinct global and spatial observables, while their infrared coefficients are not interchangeable.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.9,"main_claim_p":0.85,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.28,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.03,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.97}},{"i":10,"p":0.58,"id":"s10","own":true,"role":"result","text":"The remaining limits are also made explicit: the finite-memory correction to the continuum kernel and the controlled continuum limit of large-interval spatial entropy.","hedge":{"p":0.95,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.84,"main_claim_p":0.06,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.1,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.58,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.08,"future_work":0.01,"contribution":0.32,"interpretation":0.01}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":0.99,"text":"These results show that the same low-frequency scattering data control distinct global and spatial observables, while their infrared coefficients are not interchangeable.","location":"abstract s9","hedge_strength":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"TypeSafe API","model":"classifier-1.13.0","endpoint":"https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":8184,"cost_usd_reported":0.0},"compiled_at":"2026-10-05","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13.0","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.03,"states_limitation":0.65,"human_participants":0.01,"controlled_comparison":0.1,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.79,"compares_with_prior_results":0.39,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.02},"evidential_basis":{"p":0.63,"value":"simulation or computation","probabilities":{"argument":0.0,"literature":0.0,"proof_or_derivation":0.37,"analysis_of_existing_data":0.0,"observation_or_experiment":0.0,"simulation_or_computation":0.63}},"contribution_type":{"p":0.93,"value":"theoretical result","probabilities":{"review":0.0,"method_or_tool":0.0,"empirical_study":0.0,"simulation_study":0.07,"theoretical_result":0.93,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.0}},"contribution_statement":{"p":0.91,"text":"We study a finite-width Majorana shutter as a local, time-dependent scattering defect and determine which features of its infrared memory are insensitive to the microscopic spatial profile.","location":"abstract s0"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v1"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":11,"sentences_in_abstract":11},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448}}