{"paper":{"title":"An Energetic Consistency Test for Feedback-Driven Gas Loss in Milky Way Dwarf Satellites","arxiv_id":"2610.21186","primary_cat":"astro-ph.GA","submitted_at":"2026-10-15T03:44:45+00:00","version_compiled":"v1"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13.0 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v1","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":0.56,"id":"s0","own":false,"role":"background","text":"Dwarf spheroidal galaxies (dSphs) contain little detectable cold gas, but the relative roles of stellar feedback, reionization, and environmental effects in their gas loss remain uncertain.","hedge":{"p":0.93,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.04,"main_claim_p":0.03,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.15,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.44,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.56,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":0.79,"id":"s1","own":true,"role":"method","text":"We apply an order-of-magnitude energy-budget test to nine Milky Way dwarf satellites using published color--magnitude-diagram star formation histories (SFHs), galaxy-level velocity dispersions, effective radii, and integrated $V$-band luminosities.","hedge":{"p":0.96,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.95,"main_claim_p":0.03,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.9,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.79,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.21,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":2,"p":0.99,"id":"s2","own":true,"role":"method","text":"For each galaxy and halo prescription, we define the energy-equivalence time $\\tau_{\\mathrm{E}}$, when a crossing exists, as the first elapsed time at which the cumulative effective energy from core-collapse supernovae equals the adopted gas binding energy.","hedge":{"p":0.96,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.9,"main_claim_p":0.04,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.13,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.99,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.01,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":3,"p":0.78,"id":"s3","own":true,"role":"limitation","text":"This quantity is an energetic diagnostic rather than a direct measurement of wind launch.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.6,"main_claim_p":0.06,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.04,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.08,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.78,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.01,"interpretation":0.13}},{"i":4,"p":1.0,"id":"s4","own":true,"role":"result","text":"Under the fiducial parameters, all nine galaxies reach the nominal threshold under the kinematic--size prescription K+B16, yet star formation often continues long after threshold crossing.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.94,"main_claim_p":0.25,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.86,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":1.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":5,"p":0.96,"id":"s5","own":true,"role":"method","text":"We compare the corresponding lookback time $t_{\\mathrm{E,lb}}$ with $t_{90,\\mathrm{lb}}$, the lookback time at which 90\\% of the total initial stellar mass had formed.","hedge":{"p":0.81,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.91,"main_claim_p":0.04,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.74,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.96,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.04,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":6,"p":0.64,"id":"s6","own":true,"role":"interpretation","text":"Because both times are derived from the same cumulative SFH, their temporal proximity is interpreted descriptively rather than as independent evidence of feedback-driven quenching.","hedge":{"p":0.9,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.81,"main_claim_p":0.14,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.26,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.36,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.64}},{"i":7,"p":0.56,"id":"s7","own":true,"role":"limitation","text":"Whether the threshold is reached depends on the adopted halo mass, radius, retained gas fraction, and supernova--gas coupling efficiency.","hedge":{"p":0.99,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.57,"main_claim_p":0.1,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.05,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.02,"result":0.24,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.56,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.17}},{"i":8,"p":0.99,"id":"s8","own":true,"role":"interpretation","text":"These results distinguish the availability of sufficient cumulative feedback energy from the processes that determine the timing of quenching.","hedge":{"p":0.99,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.77,"main_claim_p":0.61,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.18,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.01,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.99}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":0.94,"text":"These results distinguish the availability of sufficient cumulative feedback energy from the processes that determine the timing of quenching.","location":"abstract s8","hedge_strength":{"p":0.99,"label":"asserted"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"TypeSafe API","model":"classifier-1.13.0","endpoint":"https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":7117,"cost_usd_reported":0.0},"compiled_at":"2026-10-16","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13.0","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.03,"states_limitation":0.97,"human_participants":0.01,"controlled_comparison":0.12,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.57,"compares_with_prior_results":0.31,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.02},"evidential_basis":{"p":1.0,"value":"analysis of existing data","probabilities":{"argument":0.0,"literature":0.0,"proof_or_derivation":0.0,"analysis_of_existing_data":1.0,"observation_or_experiment":0.0,"simulation_or_computation":0.0}},"contribution_type":{"p":0.56,"value":"method or tool","probabilities":{"review":0.0,"method_or_tool":0.56,"empirical_study":0.34,"simulation_study":0.02,"theoretical_result":0.07,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.01}},"contribution_statement":{"p":0.97,"text":"We apply an order-of-magnitude energy-budget test to nine Milky Way dwarf satellites using published color--magnitude-diagram star formation histories (SFHs), galaxy-level velocity dispersions, effective radii, and integrated $V$-band luminosities.","location":"abstract s1"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v1"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":9,"sentences_in_abstract":9},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448}}