{"paper":{"title":"A Window in the Dark Matter Exclusion Limits","arxiv_id":"astro-ph/0406531","primary_cat":"astro-ph","submitted_at":"2004-06-24T15:59:05+00:00","version_compiled":"v2"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13.0 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v2","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":0.61,"id":"s0","own":false,"role":"contribution","text":"We consider the cross section limits for light dark matter candidates ($m=0.4$ to 10 GeV).","hedge":{"p":0.63,"label":"unclear"},"own_p":0.49,"main_claim_p":0.04,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.95,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.39,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.61,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":0.89,"id":"s1","own":true,"role":"result","text":"We calculate the interaction of dark matter in the crust above underground dark matter detectors and find that in the intermediate cross section range, the energy loss of dark matter is sufficient to fall below the energy threshold of current underground experiments.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.94,"main_claim_p":0.22,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.54,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.02,"result":0.89,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.09,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":2,"p":0.98,"id":"s2","own":true,"role":"interpretation","text":"This implies the existence of a window in the dark matter exclusion limits in the micro-barn range.","hedge":{"p":0.59,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.75,"main_claim_p":0.88,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.55,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.02,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.98}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":1.0,"text":"This implies the existence of a window in the dark matter exclusion limits in the micro-barn range.","location":"abstract s2","hedge_strength":{"p":0.59,"label":"asserted"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"TypeSafe API","model":"classifier-1.13.0","endpoint":"https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":2920,"cost_usd_reported":0.0},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13.0","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.04,"states_limitation":0.16,"human_participants":0.01,"controlled_comparison":0.04,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.68,"compares_with_prior_results":0.19,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.02},"evidential_basis":{"p":0.71,"value":"simulation or computation","probabilities":{"argument":0.05,"literature":0.0,"proof_or_derivation":0.24,"analysis_of_existing_data":0.0,"observation_or_experiment":0.0,"simulation_or_computation":0.71}},"contribution_type":{"p":0.96,"value":"theoretical result","probabilities":{"review":0.0,"method_or_tool":0.0,"empirical_study":0.0,"simulation_study":0.04,"theoretical_result":0.96,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.0}},"contribution_statement":{"p":1.0,"text":"We calculate the interaction of dark matter in the crust above underground dark matter detectors and find that in the intermediate cross section range, the energy loss of dark matter is sufficient to fall below the energy threshold of current underground experiments.","location":"abstract s1"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v2"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":3,"sentences_in_abstract":3},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448,"review_comments_judged":{"judged_by":["gpt-5.6-luna","grok-4.7"],"judged_against":"Pith's own text copy of each paper: text extracted from the PDF, the first 90,000 characters","measured_on":"2026-10-04","accurate":113,"decided":149,"sampled_reviews":200,"split_by_lane":false,"by_lane":"https://pith.science/accuracy#by-lane"}}}