{"paper":{"title":"Lattice Monte Carlo Data versus Perturbation Theory","arxiv_id":"hep-lat/9610014","primary_cat":"hep-lat","submitted_at":"1996-10-10T13:04:29+00:00","version_compiled":"v1"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13-20260917 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v1","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":1.0,"id":"s0","own":false,"role":"background","text":"Differences between lattice Monte Carlo data and perturbation theory (for example the lack of asymptotic scaling) are usually associated with the `bad' behaviour of the bare lattice coupling g_0 due to the effects of large (and unknown) higher order terms in g_0.","hedge":{"p":0.58,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.05,"main_claim_p":0.03,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.12,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":1.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":1.0,"id":"s1","own":false,"role":"background","text":"In this philosophy a new, renormalised coupling g' is defined with the aim of making the higher order coefficients of the perturbative series in g' as small as possible.","hedge":{"p":0.95,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.09,"main_claim_p":0.04,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.11,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":1.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":2,"p":0.96,"id":"s2","own":false,"role":"contribution","text":"In this paper an alternative scenario is discussed where lattice artifacts are proposed as the cause of the disagreement between Monte Carlo data and the g_0-perturbative series.","hedge":{"p":0.73,"label":"hedged_possibility"},"own_p":0.19,"main_claim_p":0.11,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.09,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.01,"method":0.01,"result":0.0,"background":0.02,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.96,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":3,"p":1.0,"id":"s3","own":true,"role":"result","text":"We find that with the addition of a lattice artifact term, the usual asymptotic scaling expression in g_0 is in excellent agreement with Monte Carlo data.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.95,"main_claim_p":0.82,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.57,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":1.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":4,"p":0.57,"id":"s4","own":true,"role":"method","text":"Lattice data studied includes the string tension, the hadronic scale r_0, the discrete beta function, M_rho, f_pi and the 1P-1S splitting in charmonium.","hedge":{"p":0.95,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.68,"main_claim_p":0.03,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.1,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.57,"result":0.02,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.41,"interpretation":0.0}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":1.0,"text":"We find that with the addition of a lattice artifact term, the usual asymptotic scaling expression in g_0 is in excellent agreement with Monte Carlo data.","location":"abstract s3","hedge_strength":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"OpenRouter","model":"classifier-1.13","endpoint":"https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":4427,"cost_usd_reported":0.000186},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13-20260917","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.04,"states_limitation":0.13,"human_participants":0.01,"controlled_comparison":0.16,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.08,"compares_with_prior_results":0.89,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.02},"evidential_basis":{"p":0.71,"value":"analysis of existing data","probabilities":{"argument":0.01,"literature":0.0,"proof_or_derivation":0.0,"analysis_of_existing_data":0.71,"observation_or_experiment":0.0,"simulation_or_computation":0.28}},"contribution_type":{"p":0.42,"value":"position or commentary","probabilities":{"review":0.0,"method_or_tool":0.01,"empirical_study":0.04,"simulation_study":0.35,"theoretical_result":0.18,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.42}},"contribution_statement":{"p":0.56,"text":"In this paper an alternative scenario is discussed where lattice artifacts are proposed as the cause of the disagreement between Monte Carlo data and the g_0-perturbative series.","location":"abstract s2"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v1"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":5,"sentences_in_abstract":5},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448,"review_comments_judged":{"judged_by":["gpt-5.6-luna","grok-4.7"],"judged_against":"Pith's own text copy of each paper: text extracted from the PDF, the first 90,000 characters","measured_on":"2026-10-04","accurate":113,"decided":149,"sampled_reviews":200,"split_by_lane":false,"by_lane":"https://pith.science/accuracy#by-lane"}}}