{"paper":{"title":"Fermion mixings vs d=6 proton decay","arxiv_id":"hep-ph/0403286","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2004-03-29T19:55:02+00:00","version_compiled":"v3"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13-20260917 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v3","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":0.99,"id":"s0","own":false,"role":"background","text":"It is well known, although sometimes ignored, that not only the d=5 but also d=6 proton decay depends on fermion mixings.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.05,"main_claim_p":0.19,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.25,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.01,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.99,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":0.61,"id":"s1","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"In general we study carefully the dependence of d=6 decay on fermion mixings using the effective operator approach.","hedge":{"p":0.94,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.86,"main_claim_p":0.07,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.05,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.39,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.61,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":2,"p":0.84,"id":"s2","own":true,"role":"result","text":"We find that without specifying a theory it is impossible to make clear predictions.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.87,"main_claim_p":0.38,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.03,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.84,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.15,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.01}},{"i":3,"p":0.6,"id":"s3","own":true,"role":"limitation","text":"Even in a given model, it is often not possible to determine all the physical parameters.","hedge":{"p":0.67,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.57,"main_claim_p":0.11,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.05,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.39,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.6,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.01}},{"i":4,"p":0.68,"id":"s4","own":true,"role":"result","text":"We point out that it is possible to make a clear test of any grand unified theory with symmetric Yukawa couplings.","hedge":{"p":0.8,"label":"hedged_possibility"},"own_p":0.82,"main_claim_p":0.42,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.05,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.68,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.27,"interpretation":0.05}},{"i":5,"p":0.98,"id":"s5","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"We discuss in some detail realistic theories based on SU(5) and SO(10) gauge symmetry.","hedge":{"p":0.92,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.79,"main_claim_p":0.07,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.06,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.02,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.98,"interpretation":0.0}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":0.58,"text":"We find that without specifying a theory it is impossible to make clear predictions.","location":"abstract s2","hedge_strength":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"OpenRouter","model":"classifier-1.13","endpoint":"https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":4769,"cost_usd_reported":0.0002},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13-20260917","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.04,"states_limitation":0.85,"human_participants":0.01,"controlled_comparison":0.02,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.04,"compares_with_prior_results":0.2,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.02},"evidential_basis":{"p":0.73,"value":"proof or derivation","probabilities":{"argument":0.27,"literature":0.0,"proof_or_derivation":0.73,"analysis_of_existing_data":0.0,"observation_or_experiment":0.0,"simulation_or_computation":0.0}},"contribution_type":{"p":0.97,"value":"theoretical result","probabilities":{"review":0.0,"method_or_tool":0.01,"empirical_study":0.0,"simulation_study":0.0,"theoretical_result":0.97,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.02}},"contribution_statement":{"p":0.75,"text":"In general we study carefully the dependence of d=6 decay on fermion mixings using the effective operator approach.","location":"abstract s1"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v3"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":6,"sentences_in_abstract":6},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448,"review_comments_judged":{"judged_by":["gpt-5.6-luna","grok-4.7"],"judged_against":"Pith's own text copy of each paper: text extracted from the PDF, the first 90,000 characters","measured_on":"2026-10-04","accurate":113,"decided":149,"sampled_reviews":200,"split_by_lane":false,"by_lane":"https://pith.science/accuracy#by-lane"}}}