{"paper":{"title":"Phenomenological constraints on broken R parity symmetry in supersymmetry models","arxiv_id":"hep-ph/0406029","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2004-06-02T17:18:22+00:00","version_compiled":"v1"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13-20260917 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v1","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":1.0,"id":"s0","own":false,"role":"background","text":"The R parity odd renormalizable Yukawa interactions of quarks and leptons with the scalar superpartners have the ability to violate the baryon and lepton numbers, change the hadron and lepton flavors and make the lightest supersymmetric particle unstable.","hedge":{"p":0.52,"label":"hedged_possibility"},"own_p":0.06,"main_claim_p":0.06,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.03,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":1.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":0.99,"id":"s1","own":false,"role":"background","text":"The existence of an approximate R parity symmetry would thus affect in a deep way the conventional framework of the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model where an exact R parity symmetry is built-in by assumption.","hedge":{"p":0.62,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.06,"main_claim_p":0.08,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.05,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.99,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.01}},{"i":2,"p":0.99,"id":"s2","own":false,"role":"contribution","text":"The purpose of the present review is to survey in a systematic way the direct experimental constraints set on the R parity violating couplings by the low and intermediate energy physics processes.","hedge":{"p":0.79,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.29,"main_claim_p":0.07,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.04,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.01,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.99,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":3,"p":0.63,"id":"s3","own":true,"role":"method","text":"We consider first the option of bilinear R parity violation and spontaneously broken R parity symmetry and proceed next to the trilinear R parity violating interactions.","hedge":{"p":0.58,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.6,"main_claim_p":0.04,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.07,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.63,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.37,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":4,"p":0.77,"id":"s4","own":false,"role":"contribution","text":"The discussion aims at surveying the indirect coupling constant bounds derived from fundamental tests of the Standard Model and the variety of scattering and rare decay processes.","hedge":{"p":0.62,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.48,"main_claim_p":0.06,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.25,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.23,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.77,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":5,"p":0.95,"id":"s5","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"We also discuss the constraints imposed by the renormalization group scale evolution and the cosmological and astrophysical phenomenology.","hedge":{"p":0.8,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.5,"main_claim_p":0.05,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.04,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.05,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.95,"interpretation":0.0}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":0.57,"text":"The existence of an approximate R parity symmetry would thus affect in a deep way the conventional framework of the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model where an exact R parity symmetry is built-in by assumption.","location":"abstract s1","hedge_strength":{"p":0.62,"label":"asserted"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"OpenRouter","model":"classifier-1.13","endpoint":"https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":5052,"cost_usd_reported":0.000212},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13-20260917","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.03,"states_limitation":0.1,"human_participants":0.02,"controlled_comparison":0.05,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.04,"compares_with_prior_results":0.08,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.01},"evidential_basis":{"p":0.93,"value":"literature","probabilities":{"argument":0.0,"literature":0.93,"proof_or_derivation":0.0,"analysis_of_existing_data":0.07,"observation_or_experiment":0.0,"simulation_or_computation":0.0}},"contribution_type":{"p":1.0,"value":"review","probabilities":{"review":1.0,"method_or_tool":0.0,"empirical_study":0.0,"simulation_study":0.0,"theoretical_result":0.0,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.0}},"contribution_statement":{"p":0.91,"text":"The purpose of the present review is to survey in a systematic way the direct experimental constraints set on the R parity violating couplings by the low and intermediate energy physics processes.","location":"abstract s2"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v1"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":6,"sentences_in_abstract":6},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448,"review_comments_judged":{"judged_by":["gpt-5.6-luna","grok-4.7"],"judged_against":"Pith's own text copy of each paper: text extracted from the PDF, the first 90,000 characters","measured_on":"2026-10-04","accurate":113,"decided":149,"sampled_reviews":200,"split_by_lane":false,"by_lane":"https://pith.science/accuracy#by-lane"}}}