{"paper":{"title":"Anomalies on Orbifolds","arxiv_id":"hep-th/0103135","primary_cat":"hep-th","submitted_at":"2001-03-16T22:39:34+00:00","version_compiled":"v1"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13-20260917 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v1","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":0.81,"id":"s0","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"We discuss the form of the chiral anomaly on an S1/Z2 orbifold with chiral boundary conditions.","hedge":{"p":0.68,"label":"unclear"},"own_p":0.64,"main_claim_p":0.04,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.09,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.19,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.81,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":1.0,"id":"s1","own":true,"role":"result","text":"We find that the 4-divergence of the higher-dimensional current evaluated at a given point in the extra dimension is proportional to the probability of finding the chiral zero mode there.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.94,"main_claim_p":0.12,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.27,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":1.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":2,"p":0.99,"id":"s2","own":true,"role":"result","text":"Nevertheless the anomaly, appropriately defined as the five dimensional divergence of the current, lives entirely on the orbifold fixed planes and is independent of the shape of the zero mode.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.85,"main_claim_p":0.42,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.19,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.99,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.01}},{"i":3,"p":0.99,"id":"s3","own":true,"role":"interpretation","text":"Therefore long distance four dimensional anomaly cancellation ensures the consistency of the higher dimensional orbifold theory.","hedge":{"p":0.99,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.63,"main_claim_p":0.75,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.05,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.01,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.99}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":0.99,"text":"Therefore long distance four dimensional anomaly cancellation ensures the consistency of the higher dimensional orbifold theory.","location":"abstract s3","hedge_strength":{"p":0.99,"label":"asserted"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"OpenRouter","model":"classifier-1.13","endpoint":"https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":3568,"cost_usd_reported":0.00015},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13-20260917","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.02,"states_limitation":0.15,"human_participants":0.01,"controlled_comparison":0.01,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.08,"compares_with_prior_results":0.06,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.01},"evidential_basis":{"p":0.98,"value":"proof or derivation","probabilities":{"argument":0.02,"literature":0.0,"proof_or_derivation":0.98,"analysis_of_existing_data":0.0,"observation_or_experiment":0.0,"simulation_or_computation":0.0}},"contribution_type":{"p":1.0,"value":"theoretical result","probabilities":{"review":0.0,"method_or_tool":0.0,"empirical_study":0.0,"simulation_study":0.0,"theoretical_result":1.0,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.0}},"contribution_statement":{"p":0.83,"text":"We find that the 4-divergence of the higher-dimensional current evaluated at a given point in the extra dimension is proportional to the probability of finding the chiral zero mode there.","location":"abstract s1"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v1"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":4,"sentences_in_abstract":4},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448,"review_comments_judged":{"judged_by":["gpt-5.6-luna","grok-4.7"],"judged_against":"Pith's own text copy of each paper: text extracted from the PDF, the first 90,000 characters","measured_on":"2026-10-04","accurate":113,"decided":149,"sampled_reviews":200,"split_by_lane":false,"by_lane":"https://pith.science/accuracy#by-lane"}}}