{"paper":{"title":"A Hydrodynamic Description of Heavy Ion Collisions at the SPS and RHIC","arxiv_id":"nucl-th/0110037","primary_cat":"nucl-th","submitted_at":"2001-10-14T22:30:35+00:00","version_compiled":"v2"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13.0 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v2","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":0.89,"id":"s0","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"A hydrodynamic + cascade model of relativistic heavy ion collisions is presented and compared to available hadronic data from the SPS to RHIC.","hedge":{"p":0.97,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.89,"main_claim_p":0.1,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.55,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.11,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.89,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":1.0,"id":"s1","own":true,"role":"result","text":"The model consistently reproduces the radial and elliptic flow data for different particles, collision energies, and impact parameters.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.87,"main_claim_p":0.49,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.11,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":1.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":2,"p":0.83,"id":"s2","own":true,"role":"interpretation","text":"Three ingredients are essential to the success: (a) a reasonable EOS exhibiting the hard and soft features of the QCD phase transition, (b) thermal hadronization at the phase boundary, and (c) subsequent hadronic rescattering.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.76,"main_claim_p":0.4,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.74,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.03,"result":0.12,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.02,"interpretation":0.83}},{"i":3,"p":0.71,"id":"s3","own":true,"role":"result","text":"Some features of the RHIC data are readily explained: (i) the observed elliptic flow and its dependence on $p_{T}$ and mass, (ii) the anomalous $\\bar{p}/\\pi^{-}$ ratio for $p_{T} \\approx 2.0$ GeV, (iii) the difference in the slope parameters measured by the STAR and PHENIX collaborations, and (iv) the respectively strong and weak impact parameter dependence of the $\\bar{p}$ and $\\phi$ slope parameters.","hedge":{"p":0.74,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.61,"main_claim_p":0.11,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.93,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.71,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.01,"interpretation":0.28}},{"i":4,"p":0.78,"id":"s4","own":true,"role":"result","text":"For an EOS without the hard and soft features of the QCD phase transition, the broad consistency with the data is lost.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.79,"main_claim_p":0.21,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.22,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.78,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.01,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.21}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":0.68,"text":"The model consistently reproduces the radial and elliptic flow data for different particles, collision energies, and impact parameters.","location":"abstract s1","hedge_strength":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"TypeSafe API","model":"classifier-1.13.0","endpoint":"https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":4497,"cost_usd_reported":0.0},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13.0","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.03,"states_limitation":0.56,"human_participants":0.01,"controlled_comparison":0.16,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.6,"compares_with_prior_results":0.81,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.02},"evidential_basis":{"p":0.86,"value":"simulation or computation","probabilities":{"argument":0.0,"literature":0.0,"proof_or_derivation":0.0,"analysis_of_existing_data":0.14,"observation_or_experiment":0.0,"simulation_or_computation":0.86}},"contribution_type":{"p":0.78,"value":"simulation study","probabilities":{"review":0.0,"method_or_tool":0.1,"empirical_study":0.0,"simulation_study":0.78,"theoretical_result":0.12,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.0}},"contribution_statement":{"p":1.0,"text":"A hydrodynamic + cascade model of relativistic heavy ion collisions is presented and compared to available hadronic data from the SPS to RHIC.","location":"abstract s0"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v2"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":5,"sentences_in_abstract":5},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448}}