{"paper":{"title":"Heavy Quark Radiative Energy Loss in QCD Matter","arxiv_id":"nucl-th/0310076","primary_cat":"nucl-th","submitted_at":"2003-10-28T13:32:29+00:00","version_compiled":"v2"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13.0 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v2","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":0.83,"id":"s0","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"Heavy quark medium induced radiative energy loss is derived to all orders in opacity, $(L/\\lambda_g)^n$.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.94,"main_claim_p":0.17,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.21,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.01,"result":0.16,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.83,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":0.74,"id":"s1","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"The analytic expression generalizes the GLV opacity expansion for massless quanta to heavy quarks with mass $M$ in a QCD plasma with a gluon dispersion characterized by an asymptotic plasmon mass, $m_g=gT/\\sqrt{2}$.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.78,"main_claim_p":0.12,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.22,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.03,"result":0.22,"background":0.01,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.74,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":2,"p":0.96,"id":"s2","own":true,"role":"result","text":"Remarkably, we find that the general result is obtained by simply shifting all frequencies in the GLV series by $(m_g^2+x^2 M^2)/(2 x E)$.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.96,"main_claim_p":0.38,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.16,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.96,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.01,"interpretation":0.03}},{"i":3,"p":1.0,"id":"s3","own":true,"role":"result","text":"Numerical evaluation of the first order in opacity energy loss shows that both charm and bottom energy losses are much closer to the incoherent radiation limit than light partons in nuclear collisions at both RHIC and LHC energies.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.93,"main_claim_p":0.34,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.96,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":1.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":4,"p":0.79,"id":"s4","own":true,"role":"interpretation","text":"However, the radiation lengths of heavy quarks remain large compared to nuclear dimensions and hence high $p_T$ heavy quark production is volume rather than surface dominated.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.71,"main_claim_p":0.19,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.92,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.21,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.79}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":0.7,"text":"Numerical evaluation of the first order in opacity energy loss shows that both charm and bottom energy losses are much closer to the incoherent radiation limit than light partons in nuclear collisions at both RHIC and LHC energies.","location":"abstract s3","hedge_strength":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"TypeSafe API","model":"classifier-1.13.0","endpoint":"https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":4403,"cost_usd_reported":0.0},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13.0","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.07,"states_limitation":0.74,"human_participants":0.01,"controlled_comparison":0.46,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.2,"compares_with_prior_results":0.93,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.02},"evidential_basis":{"p":1.0,"value":"proof or derivation","probabilities":{"argument":0.0,"literature":0.0,"proof_or_derivation":1.0,"analysis_of_existing_data":0.0,"observation_or_experiment":0.0,"simulation_or_computation":0.0}},"contribution_type":{"p":1.0,"value":"theoretical result","probabilities":{"review":0.0,"method_or_tool":0.0,"empirical_study":0.0,"simulation_study":0.0,"theoretical_result":1.0,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.0}},"contribution_statement":{"p":0.58,"text":"Heavy quark medium induced radiative energy loss is derived to all orders in opacity, $(L/\\lambda_g)^n$.","location":"abstract s0"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v2"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":5,"sentences_in_abstract":5},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448}}