{"paper":{"title":"The Weakness of the Scientific Assessments: A Praise of Silence","arxiv_id":"physics/0602167","primary_cat":"physics.soc-ph","submitted_at":"2006-02-24T11:38:57+00:00","version_compiled":"v1"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13.0 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v1","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":0.98,"id":"s0","own":false,"role":"contribution","text":"This article aims to show the weakness of the current scientific assessments, based on a set of contradictory pseudo-axioms.","hedge":{"p":0.98,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.39,"main_claim_p":0.15,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.08,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.02,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.98,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":0.58,"id":"s1","own":true,"role":"method","text":"The six pseudo-axioms are deeply analysed.","hedge":{"p":0.98,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.83,"main_claim_p":0.03,"quantitative":true,"quantitative_p":0.64,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.58,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.42,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":2,"p":0.56,"id":"s2","own":true,"role":"result","text":"From the analysis are derived several conclusions.","hedge":{"p":0.97,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.83,"main_claim_p":0.05,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.07,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.19,"result":0.56,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.24,"interpretation":0.01}},{"i":3,"p":0.8,"id":"s3","own":false,"role":"result","text":"In spite of the serious efforts of the scientists to establish a ranking of honors in order to get funds or to control the academic and higher education institutions, the Science doesn't exists in itself, but different kinds of knowledge.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.13,"main_claim_p":0.47,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.16,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.8,"background":0.01,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.19}},{"i":4,"p":0.63,"id":"s4","own":false,"role":"interpretation","text":"Therefore, the scientists don't control the Science; they are mere experts in a field of knowledge, which could be expressed in many valid ways.","hedge":{"p":0.96,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.36,"main_claim_p":0.38,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.09,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.37,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.63}},{"i":5,"p":0.6,"id":"s5","own":false,"role":"interpretation","text":"This variety determines the existence of many models of academic curricula, based on heterogeneous ways of valuation that change along the History.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.33,"main_claim_p":0.16,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.1,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.4,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.6}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":0.54,"text":"In spite of the serious efforts of the scientists to establish a ranking of honors in order to get funds or to control the academic and higher education institutions, the Science doesn't exists in itself, but different kinds of knowledge.","location":"abstract s3","hedge_strength":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"TypeSafe API","model":"classifier-1.13.0","endpoint":"https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":4798,"cost_usd_reported":0.0},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13.0","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.03,"states_limitation":0.08,"human_participants":0.05,"controlled_comparison":0.02,"randomized_assignment":0.01,"states_quantitative_result":0.12,"compares_with_prior_results":0.04,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.01},"evidential_basis":{"p":0.99,"value":"argument","probabilities":{"argument":0.99,"literature":0.0,"proof_or_derivation":0.01,"analysis_of_existing_data":0.0,"observation_or_experiment":0.0,"simulation_or_computation":0.0}},"contribution_type":{"p":1.0,"value":"position or commentary","probabilities":{"review":0.0,"method_or_tool":0.0,"empirical_study":0.0,"simulation_study":0.0,"theoretical_result":0.0,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":1.0}},"contribution_statement":{"p":0.59,"text":"The six pseudo-axioms are deeply analysed.","location":"abstract s1"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v1"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":6,"sentences_in_abstract":6},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448}}