{"paper":{"title":"One-dimensional completed scattering and quantum nonlocality of entangled states","arxiv_id":"quant-ph/0602172","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2006-02-21T12:20:23+00:00","version_compiled":"v4"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13.0 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v4","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":1.0,"id":"s0","own":false,"role":"background","text":"Entanglement is usually associated with compound systems.","hedge":{"p":0.96,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.03,"main_claim_p":0.02,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.05,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":1.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":0.69,"id":"s1","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"We first show that a one-dimensional (1D) completed scattering of a particle on a static potential barrier represents an entanglement of two alternative one-particle sub-processes, transmission and reflection, macroscopically distinct at the final stage of scattering.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.92,"main_claim_p":0.37,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.26,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.3,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.69,"interpretation":0.01}},{"i":2,"p":0.4,"id":"s2","own":true,"role":"contribution","text":"The wave function for the whole ensemble of scattering particles can be uniquely presented as the sum of two isometrically evolved wave packets to describe the (to-be-)transmitted and (to-be-)reflected subensembles of particles at all stages of scattering.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.82,"main_claim_p":0.1,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.14,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.37,"result":0.22,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.4,"interpretation":0.01}},{"i":3,"p":0.93,"id":"s3","own":true,"role":"result","text":"A noninvasive Larmor-clock timing procedure adapted to either subensemble shows that namely the dwell time gives the time spent, on the average, by a particle in the barrier region, and it denies the Hartman effect.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.8,"main_claim_p":0.12,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.12,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.05,"result":0.93,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.02,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":4,"p":0.76,"id":"s4","own":true,"role":"result","text":"As regards the group time, it cannot be measured and hence it cannot be accepted as a measure of the tunneling time.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.51,"main_claim_p":0.09,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.06,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.76,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.01,"interpretation":0.23}},{"i":5,"p":0.98,"id":"s5","own":false,"role":"interpretation","text":"We argue that nonlocality of entangled states appears in quantum mechanics due to inconsistency of its superposition principle with the corpuscular properties of a particle.","hedge":{"p":0.83,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.41,"main_claim_p":0.51,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.05,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.01,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.01,"interpretation":0.98}},{"i":6,"p":1.0,"id":"s6","own":false,"role":"interpretation","text":"For example, this principle associates a 1D completed scattering with a single (one-way) process, while a particle, as an indivisible object, cannot take part in transmission and reflection, simultaneously.","hedge":{"p":0.99,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.21,"main_claim_p":0.2,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.3,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.0,"interpretation":1.0}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":0.78,"text":"We argue that nonlocality of entangled states appears in quantum mechanics due to inconsistency of its superposition principle with the corpuscular properties of a particle.","location":"abstract s5","hedge_strength":{"p":0.83,"label":"asserted"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"TypeSafe API","model":"classifier-1.13.0","endpoint":"https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":5787,"cost_usd_reported":0.0},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13.0","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.36,"states_limitation":0.26,"human_participants":0.01,"controlled_comparison":0.03,"randomized_assignment":0.02,"states_quantitative_result":0.05,"compares_with_prior_results":0.38,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.02},"evidential_basis":{"p":0.59,"value":"argument","probabilities":{"argument":0.59,"literature":0.0,"proof_or_derivation":0.41,"analysis_of_existing_data":0.0,"observation_or_experiment":0.0,"simulation_or_computation":0.0}},"contribution_type":{"p":0.8,"value":"theoretical result","probabilities":{"review":0.0,"method_or_tool":0.01,"empirical_study":0.0,"simulation_study":0.0,"theoretical_result":0.8,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":0.19}},"contribution_statement":{"p":1.0,"text":"We first show that a one-dimensional (1D) completed scattering of a particle on a static potential barrier represents an entanglement of two alternative one-particle sub-processes, transmission and reflection, macroscopically distinct at the final stage of scattering.","location":"abstract s1"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v4"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":7,"sentences_in_abstract":7},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448}}