{"paper":{"title":"Comment on \"Experimental motivation and empirical consistency in minimal no-collapse quantum mechanics\"","arxiv_id":"quant-ph/0602190","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2006-02-22T19:52:51+00:00","version_compiled":"v1"},"notice":"Every quoted sentence is the authors' text from the arXiv listing abstract. Labels and probabilities are the outputs of classifier-1.13.0 on the question bank abstract-p1-20260923, exactly as returned. No sentence in this record was written by a language model.","schema":"pith.compiled-record/v0","status":"compiled","abstract":{"source":"arXiv listing abstract v1","sentences":[{"i":0,"p":0.99,"id":"s0","own":false,"role":"background","text":"Schlosshauer has advanced a theory of minimal no-collapse quantum mechanics for a decoherence-based subjective resolution of the measurement problem.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.04,"main_claim_p":0.05,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.04,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.0,"background":0.99,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.01,"interpretation":0.0}},{"i":1,"p":0.96,"id":"s1","own":false,"role":"background","text":"The basic premise being that superposition states are maintained beyond the retinal apparatus, becoming correlated with neuronal arrays located in the occipital lobe of the brain.","hedge":{"p":0.94,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.05,"main_claim_p":0.04,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.03,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.01,"result":0.0,"background":0.96,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.02,"interpretation":0.01}},{"i":2,"p":0.87,"id":"s2","own":false,"role":"background","text":"Decoherence for these neurons in a superposition of firing and resting, leads to an irreversible dynamical decoupling of the two branches, resulting in the emergence of a single subjective perception.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.08,"main_claim_p":0.06,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.1,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.03,"result":0.01,"background":0.87,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.01,"interpretation":0.08}},{"i":3,"p":0.81,"id":"s3","own":true,"role":"result","text":"Based upon prior retinal research, it is shown that his theory is untenable for several reasons.","hedge":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"},"own_p":0.66,"main_claim_p":0.85,"quantitative":false,"quantitative_p":0.08,"role_probabilities":{"gap":0.0,"method":0.0,"result":0.81,"background":0.0,"limitation":0.0,"future_work":0.0,"contribution":0.18,"interpretation":0.01}}]},"compiled":{"main_claim":{"p":1.0,"text":"Based upon prior retinal research, it is shown that his theory is untenable for several reasons.","location":"abstract s3","hedge_strength":{"p":1.0,"label":"asserted"}},"provenance":{"route":{"via":"TypeSafe API","model":"classifier-1.13.0","endpoint":"https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone","provider":"TypeSafe"},"packing":"one request per paper","requests":1,"input_tokens":3618,"cost_usd_reported":0.0},"compiled_at":"2026-09-23","bank_version":"abstract-p1-20260923","model_version":"classifier-1.13.0","abstract_states":{"claims_first":0.04,"states_limitation":0.15,"human_participants":0.26,"controlled_comparison":0.03,"randomized_assignment":0.02,"states_quantitative_result":0.03,"compares_with_prior_results":0.52,"mentions_code_or_data_availability":0.02},"evidential_basis":{"p":0.63,"value":"literature","probabilities":{"argument":0.33,"literature":0.63,"proof_or_derivation":0.0,"analysis_of_existing_data":0.04,"observation_or_experiment":0.0,"simulation_or_computation":0.0}},"contribution_type":{"p":1.0,"value":"position or commentary","probabilities":{"review":0.0,"method_or_tool":0.0,"empirical_study":0.0,"simulation_study":0.0,"theoretical_result":0.0,"dataset_or_benchmark":0.0,"position_or_commentary":1.0}},"contribution_statement":{"p":0.99,"text":"Based upon prior retinal research, it is shown that his theory is untenable for several reasons.","location":"abstract s3"}},"coverage":{"tier":"abstract","levels_run":["P abstract"],"not_examined":["full text","figures and tables","references and citing sentences","relations to other papers"],"sources_read":["arXiv listing abstract v1"],"levels_not_run":["S sections","T body sentences","C citations","R cross-paper relations"],"sentences_examined":4,"sentences_in_abstract":4},"measured_accuracy":{"url":"https://pith.science/accuracy","measured_on":"2026-10-02","method":"two independent model families labelled a fresh random sample blind; the figure is how often the published label matches their consensus","sentence_role_agreement":0.92,"main_claim_agreement":0.908,"typed_citation_agreement":0.933,"typed_citation_agreement_95_interval":[0.917,0.945],"review_comments_accurate":0.758,"review_comments_accurate_95_interval":[0.684,0.82],"review_caught_admitted_error_found_or_related":0.448}}