Big AI captures regulation through 27 mechanisms in five categories, most commonly via discourse influence and law elusion, often justified by narratives that regulation stifles innovation or serves national interest.
The risks of industry influence in tech research
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.CY 2years
2026 2verdicts
CONDITIONAL 2roles
background 1polarities
support 1representative citing papers
80% of hateful tweets remain online after five months with no higher removal rate than non-hateful content, while human-AI moderation pipelines can feasibly cut user exposure below regulatory penalty costs.
citing papers explorer
-
Big AI's Regulatory Capture: Mapping Industry Interference and Government Complicity
Big AI captures regulation through 27 mechanisms in five categories, most commonly via discourse influence and law elusion, often justified by narratives that regulation stifles innovation or serves national interest.
-
The Enforcement and Feasibility of Hate Speech Moderation on Twitter
80% of hateful tweets remain online after five months with no higher removal rate than non-hateful content, while human-AI moderation pipelines can feasibly cut user exposure below regulatory penalty costs.