Pith. sign in

hub Mixed citations

Codeelo: Benchmarking competition-level code generation of llms with human-comparable elo ratings

Mixed citation behavior. Most common role is background (40%).

17 Pith papers citing it
1 external citations · Pith
Background 40% of classified citations
abstract

With the increasing code reasoning capabilities of existing large language models (LLMs) and breakthroughs in reasoning models like OpenAI o1 and o3, there is a growing need to develop more challenging and comprehensive benchmarks that effectively test their sophisticated competition-level coding abilities. Existing benchmarks, like LiveCodeBench and USACO, fall short due to the unavailability of private test cases, lack of support for special judges, and misaligned execution environments. To bridge this gap, we introduce CodeElo, a standardized competition-level code generation benchmark that effectively addresses all these challenges for the first time. CodeElo benchmark is mainly based on the official CodeForces platform and tries to align with the platform as much as possible. We compile the recent six months of contest problems on CodeForces with detailed information such as contest divisions, problem difficulty ratings, and problem algorithm tags. We introduce a unique judging method in which problems are submitted directly to the platform and develop a reliable Elo rating calculation system that aligns with the platform and is comparable with human participants but has lower variance. By testing on our CodeElo, we provide the Elo ratings of 30 existing popular open-source and 3 proprietary LLMs for the first time. The results show that o1-mini and QwQ-32B-Preview stand out significantly, achieving Elo ratings of 1578 and 1261, respectively, while other models struggle even with the easiest problems, placing in the lowest 25 percent among all human participants. Detailed analysis experiments are also conducted to provide insights into performance across algorithms and comparisons between using C++ and Python, which can suggest directions for future studies.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 2 dataset 2 method 1

citation-polarity summary

years

2026 14 2025 3

representative citing papers

Scalable Token-Level Hallucination Detection in Large Language Models

cs.CL · 2026-05-12 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

TokenHD uses a scalable data synthesis engine and importance-weighted training to create token-level hallucination detectors that work on free-form text and scale from 0.6B to 8B parameters, outperforming larger reasoning models.

ShinkaEvolve: Towards Open-Ended And Sample-Efficient Program Evolution

cs.CL · 2025-09-17 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

ShinkaEvolve improves sample efficiency in LLM-driven program evolution via parent sampling, code novelty rejection-sampling, and bandit LLM ensemble selection, achieving new SOTA circle packing with 150 samples and gains on math reasoning and competitive programming tasks.

Sakana Fugu Technical Report

cs.LG · 2026-06-19 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

Sakana Fugu trains LLM orchestrators using fine-tuning, evolutionary algorithms, and RL to build query-adaptive multi-agent scaffolds, claiming SOTA results on benchmarks including SWE-Bench Pro and GPQA-Diamond.

Leveraging Error Diversity in Group Rollouts for Reinforcement Learning

cs.LG · 2026-05-17 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0 · 2 refs

EDAS modulates RL advantage signals for incorrect rollouts by amplifying penalties on repeated errors and attenuating them on rare ones, yielding average gains of 6.29 points over DAPO on Qwen3-8B across seven math benchmarks.

Qwen3 Technical Report

cs.CL · 2025-05-14 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

Pith review generated a malformed one-line summary.

citing papers explorer

Showing 17 of 17 citing papers.