{"total":16,"items":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.07198","ref_index":46,"ref_count":1,"confidence":0.98,"is_internal_anchor":true,"paper_title":"Inclusive Charmless Non-Leptonic B Decays at NLO within and beyond the Standard Model","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2026-07-08T09:31:26+00:00","verdict":"ACCEPT","verdict_confidence":"MODERATE","novelty_score":6.0,"formal_verification":"none","one_line_summary":"Complete NLO QCD corrections to charmless inclusive non-leptonic B-decay widths are computed for the full BSM operator set, yielding 26 constrained directions in Wilson coefficient space.","context_count":0,"top_context_role":null,"top_context_polarity":null,"context_text":null},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.23580","ref_index":30,"ref_count":1,"confidence":0.9,"is_internal_anchor":false,"paper_title":"Quantification of the Flavor Diagonal Hadronic CP Violation","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2026-06-22T16:46:22+00:00","verdict":"UNVERDICTED","verdict_confidence":"UNKNOWN","novelty_score":2.0,"formal_verification":"none","one_line_summary":"A review of progress in quantifying flavor-diagonal hadronic CP violation effects on EDMs, neutron optics, beta decay, and an attempt to address the strong CP problem without new fields or interactions.","context_count":0,"top_context_role":null,"top_context_polarity":null,"context_text":null},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.19202","ref_index":8,"ref_count":1,"confidence":0.9,"is_internal_anchor":false,"paper_title":"Renormalization of the SMEFT to Dimension Eight: Fermionic Interactions II","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2026-06-17T15:40:05+00:00","verdict":"UNVERDICTED","verdict_confidence":"LOW","novelty_score":5.0,"formal_verification":"none","one_line_summary":"Computes one-loop mixing of bosonic and two-fermion interactions into two-fermion operators in dim-8 SMEFT, leaving only four-fermion to two-fermion mixing to finish the renormalization program.","context_count":0,"top_context_role":null,"top_context_polarity":null,"context_text":null},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.11083","ref_index":80,"ref_count":1,"confidence":0.9,"is_internal_anchor":false,"paper_title":"Matrix element method at NLO: A fine proof of concept in POWHEG","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2026-06-09T16:42:10+00:00","verdict":"UNVERDICTED","verdict_confidence":"LOW","novelty_score":6.0,"formal_verification":"none","one_line_summary":"Proof-of-concept for NLO matrix element method via POWHEG projections applied to fully leptonic WW production in SMEFT, demonstrating near-optimal classification of BSM versus SM events using lepton correlations.","context_count":1,"top_context_role":"background","top_context_polarity":"background","context_text":"2092 [hep-ph]. [76] S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re, JHEP06, 043 (2010), arXiv:1002.2581 [hep-ph]. [77] W. Buchmüller and D. Wyler, Nucl. Phys. B268, 621 (1986). [78] B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak, and J. Rosiek, JHEP10, 085 (2010), arXiv:1008.4884 [hep-ph]. [79] I. Brivio and M. Trott, Phys. Rept.793, 1 (2019), arXiv:1706.08945 [hep-ph]. [80] G. Isidori, F. Wilsch, and D. Wyler, Rev. Mod. Phys.96, 015006 (2024), arXiv:2303.16922 [hep-ph]. [81] S. Frixione, Z. Kunszt, and A. Signer, Nucl. Phys. B467, 399 (1996), arXiv:hep-ph/9512328. [82] J. Neyman and E. S. Pearson, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A231, 289 (1933). [83] R. J. Barlow, J. Comput. Phys.72, 202 (1987). [84] M. Pivk and F. R. Le Diberder, Nucl."},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.07232","ref_index":22,"ref_count":1,"confidence":0.9,"is_internal_anchor":false,"paper_title":"Current and future constraints on heavy New Physics from $\\tau$ weak dipole moments","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2026-06-05T12:59:24+00:00","verdict":"UNVERDICTED","verdict_confidence":"LOW","novelty_score":5.0,"formal_verification":"none","one_line_summary":"Tau weak dipole moments already rank among the leading probes of tau dipole operators and will become dominant at FCC-ee and HL-LHC.","context_count":0,"top_context_role":null,"top_context_polarity":null,"context_text":null},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.00830","ref_index":4,"ref_count":1,"confidence":0.9,"is_internal_anchor":false,"paper_title":"$n \\to K\\ell$ and the baryon asymmetry of the universe","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2026-05-30T18:03:43+00:00","verdict":"CONDITIONAL","verdict_confidence":"LOW","novelty_score":5.0,"formal_verification":"none","one_line_summary":"In SMEFT, the (B-L)-violating decay n → K⁺ℓ⁻ appears at dimension seven while the conserving n → K⁻ℓ⁺ requires dimension ten and is accompanied by lower-dimensional (B+L)-violating modes, so n → Kℓ without modes like p → π⁰ℓ⁺ suggests (B-L) violation.","context_count":0,"top_context_role":null,"top_context_polarity":null,"context_text":null},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.27525","ref_index":23,"ref_count":1,"confidence":0.9,"is_internal_anchor":false,"paper_title":"Hunting New Animalcula with Flavour Changing Processes","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2026-05-26T18:01:08+00:00","verdict":"UNVERDICTED","verdict_confidence":"LOW","novelty_score":2.0,"formal_verification":"none","one_line_summary":"Review advocating correlations among flavour observables as direct tests for specific new physics models beyond global fits to Wilson coefficients.","context_count":0,"top_context_role":null,"top_context_polarity":null,"context_text":null},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.21594","ref_index":7,"ref_count":1,"confidence":0.9,"is_internal_anchor":false,"paper_title":"Exploring the SMEFT landscape: Bayesian Model Selection for indirect discovery","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2026-05-20T18:00:06+00:00","verdict":"UNVERDICTED","verdict_confidence":"LOW","novelty_score":7.0,"formal_verification":"none","one_line_summary":"Bayesian model selection over SMEFT operator subsets using a genetic algorithm and BIC approximation is applied to electroweak, Higgs, top and diboson data, finding no evidence for new physics and improved Wilson coefficient posteriors compared to global fits.","context_count":0,"top_context_role":null,"top_context_polarity":null,"context_text":null},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.26817","ref_index":12,"ref_count":1,"confidence":0.9,"is_internal_anchor":false,"paper_title":"When Two Loops Matter: Electroweak Precision in the SMEFT","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2026-04-29T15:44:53+00:00","verdict":"UNVERDICTED","verdict_confidence":"LOW","novelty_score":7.0,"formal_verification":"none","one_line_summary":"A modification to the top-Higgs Yukawa coupling in SMEFT induces a two-loop shift in the W mass through a large anomalous dimension, providing a new indirect probe via electroweak precision observables.","context_count":1,"top_context_role":"background","top_context_polarity":"background","context_text":"[10] J. C. Criado,MatchingTools: a Python library for symbolic effective field theory calculations,Comput. Phys. Commun.227(2018) 42-50, [arXiv:1710.06445]. [11] J. Fuentes-Martin, M. K¨ onig, J. Pag` es, A. E. Thomsen, and F. Wilsch,SuperTracer: A Calculator of Functional Supertraces for One-Loop EFT Matching, JHEP04(2021) 281, [arXiv:2012.08506]. [12] A. Carmona, A. Lazopoulos, P. Olgoso, and J. Santiago,Matchmakereft: automated tree-level and one-loop matching,SciPost Phys.12(2022), no. 6 198, [arXiv:2112.10787]. 10 [13] T. Cohen, X. Lu, and Z. Zhang,STrEAMlining EFT Matching,SciPost Phys.10(2021), no. 5 098, [arXiv:2012.07851]. [14] J. Fuentes-Mart' ın, M. K¨ onig, J. Pag` es, A. E. Thomsen,"},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.25134","ref_index":7,"ref_count":1,"confidence":0.9,"is_internal_anchor":false,"paper_title":"Basis for non-derivative baryon-number-violating operators","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2026-04-28T02:11:46+00:00","verdict":"UNVERDICTED","verdict_confidence":"LOW","novelty_score":7.0,"formal_verification":"none","one_line_summary":"A minimal basis with fewer terms and simpler contractions is given for non-derivative baryon-number-violating operators in SMEFT up to mass dimension 11.","context_count":1,"top_context_role":"background","top_context_polarity":"background","context_text":"Indeed, we have yet to explicitly write down all experimentally testable BNV operators! In this article, we aim to make progress in this direction by constructing a basis of all non-derivative BNV operators up tod= 12 that could subsequently be used for phenomenological studies. We will work with the Standard Model Effective Field Theory (SMEFT), see refs. [7, 8] for recent reviews. The basic idea is simple: construct all possible Lorentz & gauge- invariant operators by taking products of SM fields and covariant derivatives, then order them by mass dimension. The difficult part is to find theminimalnumber of operators, or the minimal number of unknown Wilson coefficients at a givend, which define an operator"},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.22608","ref_index":7,"ref_count":1,"confidence":0.9,"is_internal_anchor":false,"paper_title":"Recent Developments in SMEFT: Theory, Tools, and Phenomenology","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2026-04-24T14:34:33+00:00","verdict":"UNVERDICTED","verdict_confidence":"LOW","novelty_score":1.0,"formal_verification":"none","one_line_summary":"A review summarizing recent theory, tools, and phenomenology in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory.","context_count":1,"top_context_role":"background","top_context_polarity":"background","context_text":"30-61,arXiv:1207.7235 [hep-ex]. [3] W. Buchmuller and D. WylerNucl. Phys. B268(1986) 621-653. REFERENCES7 [4] B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak, and J. RosiekJHEP10 (2010) 085,arXiv:1008.4884 [hep-ph]. [5] F. FeruglioInt. J. Mod. Phys. A8(1993) 4937-4972, arXiv:hep-ph/9301281. [6] G. Buchalla and O. CataJHEP07(2012) 101,arXiv:1203.6510 [hep-ph]. [7] R. Alonso, M. B. Gavela, L. Merlo, S. Rigolin, and J. YepesPhys. Lett. B722(2013) 330-335,arXiv:1212.3305 [hep-ph]. [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 726, 926 (2013)]. [8] I. Brivio and M. TrottPhys. Rept.793(2019) 1-98, arXiv:1706.08945 [hep-ph]. [9] G. Isidori, F. Wilsch, and D. WylerRev. Mod. Phys.96no. 1, (2024) 015006,arXiv:2303.16922 [hep-ph]. [10] J. Aebischer, A."},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.21857","ref_index":14,"ref_count":1,"confidence":0.9,"is_internal_anchor":false,"paper_title":"Odd Physics Off the Diagonal: Constraining CP-violating SMEFT with Quantum Tomography","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2026-04-23T16:51:52+00:00","verdict":"UNVERDICTED","verdict_confidence":"LOW","novelty_score":6.0,"formal_verification":"none","one_line_summary":"Quantum tomography of diboson spin density matrices provides superior simultaneous sensitivity to CP-even and CP-odd SMEFT operators compared to traditional angular observables.","context_count":1,"top_context_role":"background","top_context_polarity":"background","context_text":"Higgs-Gauge Interactions: From Tabletop Ex- periments to the LHC'. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.123.5 (2019), p. 051801.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 123.051801. arXiv:1903.03625 [hep-ph]. [13] Gino Isidori, Marius Wilsch and Daniel Wyler. 'The Standard Model Effective Field Theory at Work'. In:Rev. Mod. Phys.96 (2024), p. 015006. doi:10 . 1103 / RevModPhys . 96 . 015006. arXiv: 2303.16922 [hep-ph]. [14] Ilaria Brivio and Michael Trott. 'The Standard Model as an Effective Field Theory'. In:Phys. Rept.793 (2019), pp. 1-98.doi:10 . 1016 / j . physrep . 2018 . 11 . 002. arXiv:1706 . 08945 [hep-ph]. [15] K. et al. Abe. 'Search for proton decay via p -¿ e+ pi0 and p -¿ mu+ pi0 in 0.31 megaton·years exposure of the Super-Kamiokande water Cher- enkov detector'."},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.16596","ref_index":8,"ref_count":1,"confidence":0.9,"is_internal_anchor":false,"paper_title":"New Physics Reach through Precision at Future Colliders: a Multi-Pronged Approach","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2026-04-17T18:00:00+00:00","verdict":"UNVERDICTED","verdict_confidence":"LOW","novelty_score":5.0,"formal_verification":"none","one_line_summary":"Future e+e- colliders can constrain new physics through precision Higgs and electroweak measurements in Higgs-coupling, EFT, and SMEFT frameworks, with updated SMEFiT code released.","context_count":1,"top_context_role":"dataset","top_context_polarity":"use_dataset","context_text":"for the kappa analysis is based on inclusive cross-sections for Higgs boson production and decay [1,70]. The running scenarios assumed are √s= 3 TeV withL= 1 ab −1 and √s= 10 TeV withL= 10 ab −1. LHeC.For the LHeC inputs to the kappa fit, we restrict ourselves to those of the ESPPU19 analysis [30]. A more detailed and updated study, incorporating the impact of reduced LHeC uncertainties on HL-LHC measurements, has recently been presented in [8]. These LHeC projections assume a total integrated lumi- nosity ofL int = 1 ab−1 for a centre-of-mass energy of electron-proton collisions of √s= 1.2 TeV. App. E.1 collects additional information on the experimental inputs for the kappa framework analysis. Furthermore, for the kappa framework benchmarks presented in App. C.1, for consistency we adopt exactly"},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2511.23410","ref_index":11,"ref_count":1,"confidence":0.9,"is_internal_anchor":false,"paper_title":"The Art of Counting: a reappraisal of the HEFT expansion","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2025-11-28T18:04:40+00:00","verdict":"UNVERDICTED","verdict_confidence":"LOW","novelty_score":5.0,"formal_verification":"none","one_line_summary":"HEFT admits two consistent power counting schemes, one with a single low-energy scale v and one with two scales v < f, each allowing systematic truncation of operators and amplitudes for any normalization choice.","context_count":1,"top_context_role":"background","top_context_polarity":"background","context_text":"increasingly precise data collected at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) and at other high- energy physics experiments. In particular, the so-called Standard Model EFT (SMEFT) [1, 2] and Higgs EFT (HEFT) 1 [3-9] provide model-independent parameterizations of non- resonant beyond-Standard Model (BSM) signals, that could be potentially generated by heavy new particles and that can be searched for in precisely measured observables [10, 11]. Both EFTs extend the Standard Model (SM) by introducing classically non-renormalizable interactions. They differ in the representation of the four scalar fields of the theory: the SMEFT adopts a linear doublet representation of theSU(2) L gauge symmetry, that con- tains both the physical Higgs boson and the three would-be Goldstone bosons of elec-"},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.05201","ref_index":4,"ref_count":1,"confidence":0.9,"is_internal_anchor":false,"paper_title":"SUSY meets SMEFT: Complete one-loop matching of the general MSSM","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2025-06-05T16:14:25+00:00","verdict":"UNVERDICTED","verdict_confidence":"LOW","novelty_score":8.0,"formal_verification":"none","one_line_summary":"Complete one-loop matching of the general MSSM onto SMEFT in the Warsaw basis, including all SUSY-governed correlations among Wilson coefficients.","context_count":1,"top_context_role":"background","top_context_polarity":"background","context_text":"convention, which absorbs the gauge coupling into the gauge field. Including this normalization in the operators ensures that the Wilson coefficients agree between the different conventions. Further note that σI denotes the Pauli matrices such that the generators of SU(2)L take the form TI = 1 2σI, which should not be confused withσµν= i 2[γµ,γν] in our notation. Table adapted from [4]. - 38 - where in the last equality we expressed the right-handed Weyl spinorψR in terms of its charge conjugateψc L =iσ2ψ∗ R, which is left handed. Similarly , we can decompose a Majorana fermion Ψ in terms of the left-handed Weyl spinorχand its charge conjugateχc =−iσ2χ∗, which is right-handed, finding Ψ = ( χ χc ) , Ψ = ( χc†χ† ) , Ψc = Ψ . (B."},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2412.14253","ref_index":5,"ref_count":1,"confidence":0.9,"is_internal_anchor":false,"paper_title":"From the EFT to the UV: the complete SMEFT one-loop dictionary","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2024-12-18T19:00:03+00:00","verdict":"UNVERDICTED","verdict_confidence":"LOW","novelty_score":8.0,"formal_verification":"none","one_line_summary":"Complete one-loop SMEFT dim-6 dictionary for arbitrary heavy fermion and scalar UV completions, added to the SOLD package with example application to B to K nu nu anomaly.","context_count":0,"top_context_role":null,"top_context_polarity":null,"context_text":null}],"limit":50,"offset":0}