LLMs exhibit higher volatility and excessive action switching than humans in group coordination, failing to stabilize or improve convergence across repeated games.
Title resolution pending
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
years
2026 2representative citing papers
AI-mediated group discussions among basketball fans produced 62% accurate NBA forecasts, outperforming Vegas odds with higher accuracy tied to more conversation.
citing papers explorer
-
High Volatility and Action Bias Distinguish LLMs from Humans in Group Coordination
LLMs exhibit higher volatility and excessive action switching than humans in group coordination, failing to stabilize or improve convergence across repeated games.
-
Conversational Forecasting Across Large Human Groups Using A Swarm of Surrogate AI Agents
AI-mediated group discussions among basketball fans produced 62% accurate NBA forecasts, outperforming Vegas odds with higher accuracy tied to more conversation.