Pith. sign in

arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.10774 (2024)

12 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

12 Pith papers citing it
abstract

Recognizing if LLM output can be grounded in evidence is central to many tasks in NLP: retrieval-augmented generation, summarization, document-grounded dialogue, and more. Current approaches to this kind of fact-checking are based on verifying each piece of a model generation against potential evidence using an LLM. However, this process can be very computationally expensive, requiring many calls to a model to check a single response. In this work, we show how to build small fact-checking models that have GPT-4-level performance but for 400x lower cost. We do this by constructing synthetic training data with GPT-4, which involves creating realistic yet challenging instances of factual errors via a structured generation procedure. Training on this data teaches models to check each fact in the claim and recognize synthesis of information across sentences. For evaluation, we unify datasets from recent work on fact-checking and grounding LLM generations into a new benchmark, LLM-AggreFact. Our best system MiniCheck-FT5 (770M parameters) outperforms all systems of comparable size and reaches GPT-4 accuracy. We release LLM-AggreFact, code for data synthesis, and models.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.CL 10 cs.AI 2

years

2026 11 2025 1

roles

background 1

polarities

background 1

representative citing papers

Constrained Paraphrase Consistency for LLM Hallucination Detection

cs.CL · 2026-06-06 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

CCHD formulates hallucination detector training as constrained optimization with paraphrase-consistency and label-preservation rules solved via gradient descent-ascent, outperforming baselines on factuality benchmarks.

Uncertainty-Aware Web-Conditioned Scientific Fact-Checking

cs.CL · 2026-04-13 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

An uncertainty-gated fact-checking system decomposes claims atomically, verifies them against context, and selectively searches the web only for uncertain facts, outperforming benchmarks while abstaining on conflicts.

A Survey of Scaling in Large Language Model Reasoning

cs.AI · 2025-04-02 · unverdicted · novelty 3.0

A survey categorizing scaling in LLM reasoning across input size, steps, rounds, training, and future directions, noting that scaling can negatively affect performance.

citing papers explorer

Showing 12 of 12 citing papers.