A quantitative bipolar argumentation framework with five metrics is proposed to evaluate LLM debate summaries by comparing argument structures extracted from source debates and their summaries.
Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) , pages =
3 Pith papers cite this work, alongside 33 external citations. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
33
external citations · Crossref
fields
cs.CL 3representative citing papers
Fairness mitigation in personalized text generation is objective-dependent with methods occupying different regions of the fairness-personalization Pareto frontier rather than any single strategy dominating all objectives.
iPrOp is an interactive prompt optimization framework with a human in the loop; a simulation that selects prompts by training F1 shows rising validation F1 on three emotion classification datasets.
citing papers explorer
-
Evaluating LLM-Driven Summarisation of Parliamentary Debates with Computational Argumentation
A quantitative bipolar argumentation framework with five metrics is proposed to evaluate LLM debate summaries by comparing argument structures extracted from source debates and their summaries.
-
Pareto-Guided Teacher Alignment for Fair Personalized Text Generation
Fairness mitigation in personalized text generation is objective-dependent with methods occupying different regions of the fairness-personalization Pareto frontier rather than any single strategy dominating all objectives.
-
iPrOp: Interactive Prompt Optimization for Large Language Models with a Human in the Loop
iPrOp is an interactive prompt optimization framework with a human in the loop; a simulation that selects prompts by training F1 shows rising validation F1 on three emotion classification datasets.