pith. sign in

A benchmark of expert-level academic questions to assess AI capabilities.Nature, 649:1139–1146

2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

2 Pith papers citing it

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.AI 1 cs.CL 1

years

2026 2

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 2

roles

background 1

polarities

background 1

representative citing papers

Forecasting Scientific Progress with Artificial Intelligence

cs.AI · 2026-05-21 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Introduces the CUSP benchmark across 4760 events and finds frontier AI models can pick plausible directions but fail to predict whether or when scientific advances will occur, with performance varying by domain and insensitive to training cutoffs.

citing papers explorer

Showing 2 of 2 citing papers.