AI coding tools divide into collaborators that initiate most PRs and assistants that support human-led ones, yet humans retain merge authority across all five tools examined.
Hutchins, and David Kirsh
4 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
4
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
years
2026 4verdicts
UNVERDICTED 4roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
Mixed-Initiative Context reconceptualizes interaction context as a dynamic, jointly manageable structure that humans and AI can actively organize according to task needs.
PrivacyAkinator uses LLM-generated questions grounded in data-flow representations and a news-mined design space to help developers surface privacy decisions, yielding 47% more decisions identified in 73% less time than PRAM in a 24-person study.
Shorter LLM response latencies reduce perceived output thoughtfulness and usefulness, while task type affects prompting frequency independently of latency.
citing papers explorer
-
Collaborator or Assistant? How AI Coding Agents Partition Work Across Pull Request Lifecycles
AI coding tools divide into collaborators that initiate most PRs and assistants that support human-led ones, yet humans retain merge authority across all five tools examined.
-
Mixed-Initiative Context: Structuring and Managing Context for Human-AI Collaboration
Mixed-Initiative Context reconceptualizes interaction context as a dynamic, jointly manageable structure that humans and AI can actively organize according to task needs.
-
PrivacyAkinator: Articulating Key Privacy Design Decisions by Answering LLM-Generated Multiple-choice Questions
PrivacyAkinator uses LLM-generated questions grounded in data-flow representations and a news-mined design space to help developers surface privacy decisions, yielding 47% more decisions identified in 73% less time than PRAM in a 24-person study.
-
The Impact of Response Latency and Task Type on Human-LLM Interaction and Perception
Shorter LLM response latencies reduce perceived output thoughtfulness and usefulness, while task type affects prompting frequency independently of latency.