All evaluated tabular foundation models violate both marginalization and factorization consistency, so their autoregressive joint distributions are order-dependent and cannot arise from any single joint distribution.
Inconsistencies in Masked Language Models
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Learning to predict masked tokens in a sequence has been shown to be a helpful pretraining objective for powerful language models such as PaLM2. After training, such masked language models (MLMs) can provide distributions of tokens in the masked positions in a sequence. However, this paper shows that distributions corresponding to different masking patterns can demonstrate considerable inconsistencies, i.e., they cannot be derived from a coherent joint distribution when considered together. This fundamental flaw in MLMs can lead to self-contradictory behaviors during inference. On various benchmark datasets including MMLU, MLMs can give different predictions to the same input question. From BERT-base to UL2-20B, we show that such inconsistencies exist ubiquitously in MLMs of diverse sizes and configurations. In light of our observations, we further propose an inference-time strategy for MLMs called Ensemble of Conditionals. It jointly considers a selected range of inconsistent conditionals directly produced by the MLM for the final prediction, which often leads to considerable accuracy improvement.
fields
cs.LG 1years
2026 1verdicts
ACCEPT 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Do Tabular Foundation Models Agree with Themselves?
All evaluated tabular foundation models violate both marginalization and factorization consistency, so their autoregressive joint distributions are order-dependent and cannot arise from any single joint distribution.