Pith. sign in

LASA: Language-Agnostic Semantic Alignment at the Semantic Bottleneck for LLM Safety

3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

3 Pith papers citing it
abstract

Large language models (LLMs) often demonstrate strong safety performance in high-resource languages, yet exhibit severe vulnerabilities when queried in low-resource languages. We attribute this gap to a mismatch between language-agnostic semantic understanding ability and language-dominant safety alignment biased toward high-resource languages. Consistent with this hypothesis, we empirically identify the semantic bottleneck in LLMs, an intermediate layer in which the geometry of model representations is governed primarily by shared semantic content rather than language identity. Building on this observation, we propose Language-Agnostic Semantic Alignment (LASA), which anchors safety alignment directly in semantic bottlenecks. Experiments show that LASA substantially improves safety across all languages: average attack success rate (ASR) drops from 24.7% to 2.8% on LLaMA-3.1-8B-Instruct and remains around 3-4% across Qwen2.5 and Qwen3 Instruct models (7B-32B). Together, our analysis and method offer a representation-level perspective on LLM safety, suggesting that safety alignment requires anchoring safety understanding not in surface text, but in the model's language-agnostic semantic space.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.CL 2 cs.LG 1

years

2026 3

roles

background 1

polarities

background 1

representative citing papers

Multilingual Safety Alignment via Self-Distillation

cs.LG · 2026-05-03 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0 · 2 refs

MSD enables cross-lingual safety transfer in LLMs via self-distillation with Dual-Perspective Safety Weighting, improving safety in low-resource languages without target response data.

citing papers explorer

Showing 3 of 3 citing papers.