MAP-Law dynamically controls retrieval depth in legal AI by computing element coverage, evidence coverage, and marginal gain on a joint node graph, reaching 0.86 element coverage with 58% fewer rounds than fixed baselines on 50 labor-law cases.
Large legal fictions: Profiling legal hallucinations in large language models
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
verdicts
UNVERDICTED 3roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
The paper introduces a taxonomy of AI safety for LLMs organized into Trustworthy AI, Responsible AI, and Safe AI perspectives, accompanied by a review of state-of-the-art methods, challenges, and future directions.
A framework detects LLM anomalies including hallucinations, jailbreaks, and backdoors by forensic inspection of layer-wise hidden state patterns, reporting over 95% accuracy with minimal computational overhead.
citing papers explorer
-
MAP-Law: Coverage-Driven Retrieval Control for Multi-Turn Legal Consultation
MAP-Law dynamically controls retrieval depth in legal AI by computing element coverage, evidence coverage, and marginal gain on a joint node graph, reaching 0.86 element coverage with 58% fewer rounds than fixed baselines on 50 labor-law cases.
-
AI Safety Landscape for Large Language Models: Taxonomy, State-of-the-art, and Future Directions
The paper introduces a taxonomy of AI safety for LLMs organized into Trustworthy AI, Responsible AI, and Safe AI perspectives, accompanied by a review of state-of-the-art methods, challenges, and future directions.
-
Exposing the Ghost in the Transformer: Abnormal Detection for Large Language Models via Hidden State Forensics
A framework detects LLM anomalies including hallucinations, jailbreaks, and backdoors by forensic inspection of layer-wise hidden state patterns, reporting over 95% accuracy with minimal computational overhead.