Qualitative study of 20 users of integrated browser conversational AI found that citations raise trustworthiness without verification and that users apply existing LLM and search perceptions to prompting strategies.
Title resolution pending
3 Pith papers cite this work, alongside 36 external citations. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
36
external citations · Crossref
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.HC 3verdicts
UNVERDICTED 3roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
A literature review shows that constructs for appropriate reliance on AI are fragmented, presents three views on the topic, and calls for consensus on objective metrics to enable better comparisons across studies.
The paper proposes using user-centric measures (intrinsic ability, emotional well-being, self-reflection, self-perception) for evaluating explainable AI in creative tools.
citing papers explorer
-
From Trust to Appropriate Reliance: Measurement Constructs in Human-AI Decision-Making
A literature review shows that constructs for appropriate reliance on AI are fragmented, presents three views on the topic, and calls for consensus on objective metrics to enable better comparisons across studies.