Pith. sign in

Formalism 25.Journal for General Philosophy of Science16(2026), no

2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

2 Pith papers citing it

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

math.HO 2

years

2026 2

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 2

roles

background 1

polarities

background 1

representative citing papers

A philosophical history of infinitesimals

math.HO · 2026-05-13 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Leibnizian infinitesimals can be formalized using ringinals in a conservative extension of ZF set theory without the axiom of choice or ultrafilters.

Marx versus Engels on infinitesimals: Chimera or triumph?

math.HO · 2026-06-01 · unverdicted · novelty 4.0

Marx reversed from supporting to opposing infinitesimals unlike Engels, with the affinity to nonstandard analysis residing in Fermat's techniques rather than directly in Robinson.

citing papers explorer

Showing 2 of 2 citing papers.

  • A philosophical history of infinitesimals math.HO · 2026-05-13 · unverdicted · none · ref 77

    Leibnizian infinitesimals can be formalized using ringinals in a conservative extension of ZF set theory without the axiom of choice or ultrafilters.

  • Marx versus Engels on infinitesimals: Chimera or triumph? math.HO · 2026-06-01 · unverdicted · none · ref 10

    Marx reversed from supporting to opposing infinitesimals unlike Engels, with the affinity to nonstandard analysis residing in Fermat's techniques rather than directly in Robinson.