Audit finds 36-39% incorrect FOL labels in FOLIO and MALLS; corrections raise LLM accuracy 9-22 points and an LLM-guided review framework achieves 90% dataset quality after checking fewer than 24% of examples.
Title resolution pending
2 Pith papers cite this work, alongside 2 external citations. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
2
external citations · OpenAlex
fields
cs.CL 2years
2026 2verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2representative citing papers
Language models employ a highly localized shared mechanism for filler-gap dependencies but no unified mechanism for NPI licensing, and activation patching generalizes better than supervised alignment search.
citing papers explorer
-
Fixing FOLIO and MALLS: Verified Annotations and an LLM-assisted Framework to Focus Human Relabeling
Audit finds 36-39% incorrect FOL labels in FOLIO and MALLS; corrections raise LLM accuracy 9-22 points and an LLM-guided review framework achieves 90% dataset quality after checking fewer than 24% of examples.
-
Fine-Grained Analysis of Shared Syntactic Mechanisms in Language Models
Language models employ a highly localized shared mechanism for filler-gap dependencies but no unified mechanism for NPI licensing, and activation patching generalizes better than supervised alignment search.